Demographics details for Mccomb, MS vs Janesville, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mccomb, MS vs Janesville, WI.
| Data | Mccomb | Janesville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 12,041 | 65,911 |
| Median Age | 36.8 years | 39.5 years |
| Median Income | $37,288 | $68,610 |
| Married Families | 23.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 22% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.2 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Mccomb vs Janesville
- The population in Janesville is higher at 65,911, compared to 12,041 in Mccomb.
- The median age in Janesville is higher at 39.5 years, compared to 36.8 years in Mccomb.
- Janesville has a higher median income of $68,610, compared to $37,288 in Mccomb.
- In Janesville, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 23.0% in Mccomb.
- Mccomb has a higher poverty level at 22% compared to 9% in Janesville.
- The unemployment rate in Mccomb is higher at 6.2%, compared to 3.2% in Janesville.
Demographics
Demographics Mccomb vs Janesville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Mccomb | Janesville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 75 | 3 |
| White | 22 | 85 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Mccomb vs Janesville
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Mccomb at 75% compared to 3% in Janesville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Janesville at 85% compared to 22% in Mccomb.
- In Janesville, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Mccomb.
- Janesville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 2% in Mccomb.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Janesville at 5%, compared to 1% in Mccomb.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Mccomb and Janesville at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Mccomb | Janesville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.3% | 14.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.2% | 10.2% |
| Depression | 24.3% | 25.1% |
| Smoking | 25.9% | 16.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 10.8% | 23.4% |
| Obesity | 48.5% | 34.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mccomb vs Janesville
- More residents in Mccomb report poor mental health at 20.3% compared to 14.8% in Janesville.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Janesville at 25.1% versus 24.3% in Mccomb.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Mccomb at 25.9% compared to 16.1% in Janesville.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Janesville at 23.4% compared to 10.8% in Mccomb.
- Obesity rates are higher in Mccomb at 48.5% compared to 34.1% in Janesville.
- Disability percentages are higher in Mccomb at 21.0% compared to 14.0% in Janesville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Mccomb | Janesville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (81) | 0.5% (330) |
| High School Diploma | 22.1% (2,666) | 20.4% (13,471) |
| Less than High School | 11.2% (1,349) | 8.0% (5,276) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.1% (1,460) | 18.1% (11,899) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mccomb vs Janesville
- A higher percentage of residents in Mccomb have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.5% in Janesville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mccomb hold a high school diploma at 22.1% compared to 20.4% in Janesville.
- More residents in Mccomb have less than a high school education at 11.2% compared to 8.0% in Janesville.
- In Janesville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.1% compared to 12.1% in Mccomb.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.