Demographics details for Mcallen, TX vs Picayune, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mcallen, TX vs Picayune, MS.
| Data | Mcallen | Picayune |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 144,579 | 11,826 |
| Median Age | 32.9 years | 38.3 years |
| Median Income | $56,326 | $35,649 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 27.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 21% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Mcallen vs Picayune
- In Mcallen, the population is higher at 144,579, compared to 11,826 in Picayune.
- The median age in Picayune is higher at 38.3 years, compared to 32.9 years in Mcallen.
- Mcallen has a higher median income of $56,326 compared to $35,649 in Picayune.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Mcallen at 36.0% compared to 27.0% in Picayune.
- The poverty level is higher in Picayune at 21%, compared to 15% in Mcallen.
- The unemployment rate in Mcallen is higher at 5.0%, compared to 4.5% in Picayune.
Demographics
Demographics Mcallen vs Picayune provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Mcallen | Picayune |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 38 |
| White | -16 | 55 |
| Asian | 3 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 86 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 26 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Mcallen vs Picayune
- In Picayune, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 38% compared to 1% in Mcallen.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Picayune at 55% compared to -16% in Mcallen.
- The Asian population is larger in Mcallen at 3% compared to 0% in Picayune.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Mcallen at 86% compared to 2% in Picayune.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Mcallen at 26% compared to 5% in Picayune.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Mcallen and Picayune at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Mcallen | Picayune |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.6% | 18.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.6% | 14.3% |
| Depression | 18.6% | 24.0% |
| Smoking | 13.5% | 23.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.9% | 13.3% |
| Obesity | 41.8% | 44.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mcallen vs Picayune
- In Picayune, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 16.6% in Mcallen.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Picayune at 24.0% versus 18.6% in Mcallen.
- Picayune has a higher smoking rate at 23.3% compared to 13.5% in Mcallen.
- Binge drinking is more common in Mcallen at 16.9% compared to 13.3% in Picayune.
- Picayune has higher obesity rates at 44.0% compared to 41.8% in Mcallen.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Picayune at 21.0% compared to 12.0% in Mcallen.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Mcallen | Picayune |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.6% (2,361) | 0.6% (73) |
| High School Diploma | 10.4% (15,087) | 17.8% (2,108) |
| Less than High School | 25.5% (36,844) | 11.8% (1,392) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.3% (27,899) | 10.1% (1,200) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mcallen vs Picayune
- A higher percentage of residents in Mcallen have no formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.6% in Picayune.
- In Picayune, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.8% compared to 10.4% in Mcallen.
- More residents in Mcallen have less than a high school education at 25.5% compared to 11.8% in Picayune.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mcallen hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.3% compared to 10.1% in Picayune.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.