Demographics details for Mcallen, TX vs Chattanooga, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mcallen, TX vs Chattanooga, TN.
Data | Mcallen | Chattanooga |
---|---|---|
Population | 144,579 | 184,086 |
Median Age | 32.9 years | 37.0 years |
Median Income | $56,326 | $57,703 |
Married Families | 36.0% | 31.0% |
Poverty Level | 15% | 18% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Mcallen vs Chattanooga
- The population in Chattanooga is higher at 184,086, compared to 144,579 in Mcallen.
- The median age in Chattanooga is higher at 37.0 years, compared to 32.9 years in Mcallen.
- Chattanooga has a higher median income of $57,703, compared to $56,326 in Mcallen.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Mcallen at 36.0% compared to 31.0% in Chattanooga.
- The poverty level is higher in Chattanooga at 18%, compared to 15% in Mcallen.
- The unemployment rate in Mcallen is higher at 5.0%, compared to 4.0% in Chattanooga.
Demographics
Demographics Mcallen vs Chattanooga provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Mcallen | Chattanooga |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 29 |
White | -16 | 56 |
Asian | 3 | 2 |
Hispanic | 86 | 7 |
Two or More Races | 26 | 6 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Mcallen vs Chattanooga
- In Chattanooga, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 29% compared to 1% in Mcallen.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Chattanooga at 56% compared to -16% in Mcallen.
- The Asian population is larger in Mcallen at 3% compared to 2% in Chattanooga.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Mcallen at 86% compared to 7% in Chattanooga.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Mcallen at 26% compared to 6% in Chattanooga.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Mcallen and Chattanooga at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Mcallen | Chattanooga |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.6% | 18.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.6% | 13.2% |
Depression | 18.6% | 25.9% |
Smoking | 13.5% | 19.5% |
Binge Drinking | 16.9% | 14.5% |
Obesity | 41.8% | 38.1% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mcallen vs Chattanooga
- In Chattanooga, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 16.6% in Mcallen.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Chattanooga at 25.9% versus 18.6% in Mcallen.
- Chattanooga has a higher smoking rate at 19.5% compared to 13.5% in Mcallen.
- Binge drinking is more common in Mcallen at 16.9% compared to 14.5% in Chattanooga.
- Obesity rates are higher in Mcallen at 41.8% compared to 38.1% in Chattanooga.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Chattanooga at 15.0% compared to 12.0% in Mcallen.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Mcallen | Chattanooga |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.6% (2,361) | 0.9% (1,744) |
High School Diploma | 10.4% (15,087) | 13.9% (25,521) |
Less than High School | 25.5% (36,844) | 11.8% (21,703) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.3% (27,899) | 23.4% (43,030) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mcallen vs Chattanooga
- A higher percentage of residents in Mcallen have no formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.9% in Chattanooga.
- In Chattanooga, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.9% compared to 10.4% in Mcallen.
- More residents in Mcallen have less than a high school education at 25.5% compared to 11.8% in Chattanooga.
- In Chattanooga, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.4% compared to 19.3% in Mcallen.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.