Demographics details for Mc henry, MS vs Tacoma, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mc henry, MS vs Tacoma, WA.
| Data | Mc henry | Tacoma |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 183 | 221,776 |
| Median Age | 43.0 years | 36.9 years |
| Median Income | $49,000 | $79,085 |
| Married Families | 68.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 4.9 |
Population Comparison: Mc henry vs Tacoma
- The population in Tacoma is higher at 221,776, compared to 183 in Mc henry.
- Residents in Mc henry have a higher median age of 43.0 years compared to 36.9 years in Tacoma.
- Tacoma has a higher median income of $79,085, compared to $49,000 in Mc henry.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Mc henry at 68.0% compared to 36.0% in Tacoma.
- Mc henry has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 11% in Tacoma.
- The unemployment rate in Mc henry is higher at 5.0%, compared to 4.9% in Tacoma.
Demographics
Demographics Mc henry vs Tacoma provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Mc henry | Tacoma |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 20 | 11 |
| White | 70 | 53 |
| Asian | 5 | 9 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 13 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Mc henry vs Tacoma
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Mc henry at 20% compared to 11% in Tacoma.
- Mc henry has a higher percentage of White residents at 70% compared to 53% in Tacoma.
- In Tacoma, the Asian population stands at 9%, greater than 5% in Mc henry.
- Tacoma has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 3% in Mc henry.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Tacoma at 13%, compared to 2% in Mc henry.
- In Tacoma, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Mc henry.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Mc henry | Tacoma |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 18.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 11.9% |
| Depression | Data is updating% | 26.2% |
| Smoking | Data is updating% | 15.4% |
| Binge Drinking | Data is updating% | 16.2% |
| Obesity | Data is updating% | 34.6% |
| Disability Percentage | Data is updating% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mc henry vs Tacoma
- In Tacoma, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 0.0% in Mc henry.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Tacoma at 26.2% versus 0.0% in Mc henry.
- Tacoma has a higher smoking rate at 15.4% compared to 0.0% in Mc henry.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Tacoma at 16.2% compared to 0.0% in Mc henry.
- Tacoma has higher obesity rates at 34.6% compared to 0.0% in Mc henry.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Tacoma at 14.0% compared to 0.0% in Mc henry.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Mc henry | Tacoma |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.6% (3,474) |
| High School Diploma | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 14.2% (31,504) |
| Less than High School | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 10.1% (22,501) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 23.0% (50,913) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mc henry vs Tacoma
- In Tacoma, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.0% in Mc henry.
- In Tacoma, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.2% compared to 0.0% in Mc henry.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Tacoma at 10.1%, compared to 0.0% in Mc henry.
- In Tacoma, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.0% compared to 0.0% in Mc henry.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.