Demographics details for Mc henry, MS vs South jordan, UT

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Mc henry, MS vs South jordan, UT.

Data Mc henry South jordan
Population 183 83,513
Median Age 43.0 years 34.4 years
Median Income $49,000 $119,822
Married Families 68.0% 44.0%
Poverty Level 15% 5%
Unemployment Rate 5.0 3.7

Population Comparison: Mc henry vs South jordan

  • The population in South jordan is higher at 83,513, compared to 183 in Mc henry.
  • Residents in Mc henry have a higher median age of 43.0 years compared to 34.4 years in South jordan.
  • South jordan has a higher median income of $119,822, compared to $49,000 in Mc henry.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Mc henry at 68.0% compared to 44.0% in South jordan.
  • Mc henry has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 5% in South jordan.
  • The unemployment rate in Mc henry is higher at 5.0%, compared to 3.7% in South jordan.

Demographics

Demographics Mc henry vs South jordan provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Mc henry South jordan
Black 20 Data is updating
White 70 83
Asian 5 4
Hispanic 3 7
Two or More Races 2 5
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Mc henry vs South jordan

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Mc henry at 20% compared to 0% in South jordan.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in South jordan at 83% compared to 70% in Mc henry.
  • The Asian population is larger in Mc henry at 5% compared to 4% in South jordan.
  • South jordan has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 3% in Mc henry.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in South jordan at 5%, compared to 2% in Mc henry.
  • In South jordan, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Mc henry.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Mc henry South jordan
Mental Health Not Good Data is updating% 16.7%
Physical Health Not Good Data is updating% 9.0%
Depression Data is updating% 26.5%
Smoking Data is updating% 7.3%
Binge Drinking Data is updating% 16.9%
Obesity Data is updating% 28.6%
Disability Percentage Data is updating% 6.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Mc henry vs South jordan

  • In South jordan, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.7% compared to 0.0% in Mc henry.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in South jordan at 26.5% versus 0.0% in Mc henry.
  • South jordan has a higher smoking rate at 7.3% compared to 0.0% in Mc henry.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in South jordan at 16.9% compared to 0.0% in Mc henry.
  • South jordan has higher obesity rates at 28.6% compared to 0.0% in Mc henry.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in South jordan at 6.0% compared to 0.0% in Mc henry.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Mc henry South jordan
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.2% (172)
High School Diploma 0.0% (Data is updating) 8.4% (6,995)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 2.7% (2,236)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 0.0% (Data is updating) 27.1% (22,648)

Education Levels Comparison: Mc henry vs South jordan

  • In South jordan, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.2% compared to 0.0% in Mc henry.
  • In South jordan, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 8.4% compared to 0.0% in Mc henry.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in South jordan at 2.7%, compared to 0.0% in Mc henry.
  • In South jordan, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 27.1% compared to 0.0% in Mc henry.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.