Demographics details for Mc graw, NY vs Water valley, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mc graw, NY vs Water valley, MS.
| Data | Mc graw | Water valley |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 994 | 3,361 |
| Median Age | 32.0 years | 35.8 years |
| Median Income | $60,781 | $45,718 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 27.0% |
| Poverty Level | 7% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.3 |
Population Comparison: Mc graw vs Water valley
- The population in Water valley is higher at 3,361, compared to 994 in Mc graw.
- The median age in Water valley is higher at 35.8 years, compared to 32.0 years in Mc graw.
- Mc graw has a higher median income of $60,781 compared to $45,718 in Water valley.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Mc graw at 38.0% compared to 27.0% in Water valley.
- Mc graw has a higher poverty level at 7% compared to 0% in Water valley.
- Water valley has a higher unemployment rate at 4.3% compared to 3.5% in Mc graw.
Demographics
Demographics Mc graw vs Water valley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Mc graw | Water valley |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 49 |
| White | 88 | 49 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 4 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Mc graw vs Water valley
- In Water valley, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 49% compared to 0% in Mc graw.
- Mc graw has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 49% in Water valley.
- Both Mc graw and Water valley have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Mc graw at 4% compared to 2% in Water valley.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Mc graw at 8% compared to 0% in Water valley.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Mc graw and Water valley at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Mc graw | Water valley |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.2% | 18.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.2% | 13.8% |
| Depression | 25.5% | 22.0% |
| Smoking | 18.6% | 23.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.1% | 12.9% |
| Obesity | 37.3% | 44.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mc graw vs Water valley
- In Water valley, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.2% compared to 16.2% in Mc graw.
- Depression is more prevalent in Mc graw at 25.5% compared to 22.0% in Water valley.
- Water valley has a higher smoking rate at 23.1% compared to 18.6% in Mc graw.
- Binge drinking is more common in Mc graw at 19.1% compared to 12.9% in Water valley.
- Water valley has higher obesity rates at 44.0% compared to 37.3% in Mc graw.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Mc graw and Water valley at 14.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Mc graw | Water valley |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (3) | 1.0% (34) |
| High School Diploma | 27.1% (269) | 24.0% (805) |
| Less than High School | 15.1% (150) | 13.0% (437) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.8% (87) | 9.6% (322) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mc graw vs Water valley
- In Water valley, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.3% in Mc graw.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mc graw hold a high school diploma at 27.1% compared to 24.0% in Water valley.
- More residents in Mc graw have less than a high school education at 15.1% compared to 13.0% in Water valley.
- In Water valley, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.6% compared to 8.8% in Mc graw.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.