Demographics details for Mc graw, NY vs Sharon, MA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mc graw, NY vs Sharon, MA.
| Data | Mc graw | Sharon |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 994 | 17,612 |
| Median Age | 32.0 years | 40.5 years |
| Median Income | $60,781 | $126,000 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 62.0% |
| Poverty Level | 7% | 2% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Mc graw vs Sharon
- The population in Sharon is higher at 17,612, compared to 994 in Mc graw.
- The median age in Sharon is higher at 40.5 years, compared to 32.0 years in Mc graw.
- Sharon has a higher median income of $126,000, compared to $60,781 in Mc graw.
- In Sharon, the percentage of married families is higher at 62.0%, compared to 38.0% in Mc graw.
- Mc graw has a higher poverty level at 7% compared to 2% in Sharon.
- Sharon has a higher unemployment rate at 3.6% compared to 3.5% in Mc graw.
Demographics
Demographics Mc graw vs Sharon provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Mc graw | Sharon |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 1.9 |
| White | 88 | 88.2 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 5.3 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 3.5 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 2.0 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 0.1 |
Demographics Comparison: Mc graw vs Sharon
- In Sharon, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1.9% compared to 0% in Mc graw.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Sharon at 88.2% compared to 88% in Mc graw.
- In Sharon, the Asian population stands at 5.3%, greater than 0% in Mc graw.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Mc graw at 4% compared to 3.5% in Sharon.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Mc graw at 8% compared to 2.0% in Sharon.
- In Sharon, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 0.1%, compared to 0% in Mc graw.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Mc graw | Sharon |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.2% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.2% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 25.5% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 18.6% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.1% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 37.3% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mc graw vs Sharon
- More residents in Mc graw report poor mental health at 16.2% compared to 0.0% in Sharon.
- Depression is more prevalent in Mc graw at 25.5% compared to 0.0% in Sharon.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Mc graw at 18.6% compared to 0.0% in Sharon.
- Binge drinking is more common in Mc graw at 19.1% compared to 0.0% in Sharon.
- Obesity rates are higher in Mc graw at 37.3% compared to 0.0% in Sharon.
- Disability percentages are higher in Mc graw at 14.0% compared to 0.0% in Sharon.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Mc graw | Sharon |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (3) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 27.1% (269) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Less than High School | 15.1% (150) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.8% (87) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mc graw vs Sharon
- A higher percentage of residents in Mc graw have no formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.0% in Sharon.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mc graw hold a high school diploma at 27.1% compared to 0.0% in Sharon.
- More residents in Mc graw have less than a high school education at 15.1% compared to 0.0% in Sharon.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mc graw hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 8.8% compared to 0.0% in Sharon.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.