Demographics details for Mc graw, NY vs Monroe city, MO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mc graw, NY vs Monroe city, MO.
| Data | Mc graw | Monroe city |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 994 | 2,650 |
| Median Age | 32.0 years | 40.1 years |
| Median Income | $60,781 | $50,885 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 7% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Mc graw vs Monroe city
- The population in Monroe city is higher at 2,650, compared to 994 in Mc graw.
- The median age in Monroe city is higher at 40.1 years, compared to 32.0 years in Mc graw.
- Mc graw has a higher median income of $60,781 compared to $50,885 in Monroe city.
- In Monroe city, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 38.0% in Mc graw.
- The poverty level is higher in Monroe city at 13%, compared to 7% in Mc graw.
- The unemployment rate in Mc graw is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.2% in Monroe city.
Demographics
Demographics Mc graw vs Monroe city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Mc graw | Monroe city |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 11 |
| White | 88 | 79 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Mc graw vs Monroe city
- In Monroe city, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 11% compared to 0% in Mc graw.
- Mc graw has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 79% in Monroe city.
- In Monroe city, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Mc graw.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Mc graw at 4% compared to 1% in Monroe city.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Mc graw at 8% compared to 5% in Monroe city.
- In Monroe city, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Mc graw.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Mc graw | Monroe city |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.2% | 18.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.2% | 13.1% |
| Depression | 25.5% | 25.7% |
| Smoking | 18.6% | 22.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.1% | 17.7% |
| Obesity | 37.3% | 41.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mc graw vs Monroe city
- In Monroe city, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 16.2% in Mc graw.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Monroe city at 25.7% versus 25.5% in Mc graw.
- Monroe city has a higher smoking rate at 22.3% compared to 18.6% in Mc graw.
- Binge drinking is more common in Mc graw at 19.1% compared to 17.7% in Monroe city.
- Monroe city has higher obesity rates at 41.5% compared to 37.3% in Mc graw.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Monroe city at 21.0% compared to 14.0% in Mc graw.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Mc graw | Monroe city |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (3) | 0.5% (13) |
| High School Diploma | 27.1% (269) | 33.2% (880) |
| Less than High School | 15.1% (150) | 20.6% (545) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.8% (87) | 12.2% (323) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mc graw vs Monroe city
- In Monroe city, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.3% in Mc graw.
- In Monroe city, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 33.2% compared to 27.1% in Mc graw.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Monroe city at 20.6%, compared to 15.1% in Mc graw.
- In Monroe city, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.2% compared to 8.8% in Mc graw.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.