Demographics details for Mc graw, NY vs Carleton, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mc graw, NY vs Carleton, MI.
| Data | Mc graw | Carleton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 994 | 2,350 |
| Median Age | 32.0 years | 38.3 years |
| Median Income | $60,781 | $54,028 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 7% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Mc graw vs Carleton
- The population in Carleton is higher at 2,350, compared to 994 in Mc graw.
- The median age in Carleton is higher at 38.3 years, compared to 32.0 years in Mc graw.
- Mc graw has a higher median income of $60,781 compared to $54,028 in Carleton.
- In Carleton, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 38.0% in Mc graw.
- The poverty level is higher in Carleton at 8%, compared to 7% in Mc graw.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Mc graw and Carleton at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Mc graw vs Carleton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Mc graw | Carleton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 1 |
| White | 88 | 84 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 4 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 10 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Mc graw vs Carleton
- In Carleton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Mc graw.
- Mc graw has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 84% in Carleton.
- Both Mc graw and Carleton have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Carleton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 4% in Mc graw.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Carleton at 10%, compared to 8% in Mc graw.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Mc graw and Carleton at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Mc graw | Carleton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.2% | 17.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.2% | 10.6% |
| Depression | 25.5% | 24.1% |
| Smoking | 18.6% | 17.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.1% | 19.8% |
| Obesity | 37.3% | 39.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mc graw vs Carleton
- In Carleton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.0% compared to 16.2% in Mc graw.
- Depression is more prevalent in Mc graw at 25.5% compared to 24.1% in Carleton.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Mc graw at 18.6% compared to 17.4% in Carleton.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Carleton at 19.8% compared to 19.1% in Mc graw.
- Carleton has higher obesity rates at 39.4% compared to 37.3% in Mc graw.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Carleton at 21.0% compared to 14.0% in Mc graw.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Mc graw | Carleton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (3) | 0.6% (15) |
| High School Diploma | 27.1% (269) | 30.3% (713) |
| Less than High School | 15.1% (150) | 20.8% (488) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.8% (87) | 6.8% (160) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mc graw vs Carleton
- In Carleton, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.3% in Mc graw.
- In Carleton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 30.3% compared to 27.1% in Mc graw.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Carleton at 20.8%, compared to 15.1% in Mc graw.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mc graw hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 8.8% compared to 6.8% in Carleton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.