Demographics details for Mc clure, OH vs Madisonville, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mc clure, OH vs Madisonville, TX.
Data | Mc clure | Madisonville |
---|---|---|
Population | 693 | 4,564 |
Median Age | 30.5 years | 38.2 years |
Median Income | $55,938 | $62,135 |
Married Families | 37.0% | 34.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Mc clure vs Madisonville
- The population in Madisonville is higher at 4,564, compared to 693 in Mc clure.
- The median age in Madisonville is higher at 38.2 years, compared to 30.5 years in Mc clure.
- Madisonville has a higher median income of $62,135, compared to $55,938 in Mc clure.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Mc clure at 37.0% compared to 34.0% in Madisonville.
- The poverty level is higher in Madisonville at 15%, compared to 12% in Mc clure.
- Madisonville has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 4.0% in Mc clure.
Demographics
Demographics Mc clure vs Madisonville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Mc clure | Madisonville |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 23 |
White | 65 | 31 |
Asian | 4 | 1 |
Hispanic | 16 | 36 |
Two or More Races | 15 | 9 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Mc clure vs Madisonville
- In Madisonville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 23% compared to 0% in Mc clure.
- Mc clure has a higher percentage of White residents at 65% compared to 31% in Madisonville.
- The Asian population is larger in Mc clure at 4% compared to 1% in Madisonville.
- Madisonville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 36%, compared to 16% in Mc clure.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Mc clure at 15% compared to 9% in Madisonville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Mc clure and Madisonville at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Mc clure | Madisonville |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.4% | 18.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.5% | 13.1% |
Depression | 22.4% | 22.7% |
Smoking | 18.2% | 18.8% |
Binge Drinking | 19.9% | 16.7% |
Obesity | 40.2% | 39.6% |
Disability Percentage | 22.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mc clure vs Madisonville
- In Madisonville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.1% compared to 16.4% in Mc clure.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Madisonville at 22.7% versus 22.4% in Mc clure.
- Madisonville has a higher smoking rate at 18.8% compared to 18.2% in Mc clure.
- Binge drinking is more common in Mc clure at 19.9% compared to 16.7% in Madisonville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Mc clure at 40.2% compared to 39.6% in Madisonville.
- Disability percentages are higher in Mc clure at 22.0% compared to 16.0% in Madisonville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Mc clure | Madisonville |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.3% (2) | 2.3% (106) |
High School Diploma | 28.6% (198) | 13.4% (610) |
Less than High School | 17.7% (123) | 37.0% (1,690) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 5.5% (38) | 8.6% (394) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mc clure vs Madisonville
- In Madisonville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.3% compared to 0.3% in Mc clure.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mc clure hold a high school diploma at 28.6% compared to 13.4% in Madisonville.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Madisonville at 37.0%, compared to 17.7% in Mc clure.
- In Madisonville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 8.6% compared to 5.5% in Mc clure.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.