Demographics details for Mc clure, OH vs Lawrence, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mc clure, OH vs Lawrence, KS.
| Data | Mc clure | Lawrence |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 693 | 95,794 |
| Median Age | 30.5 years | 28.8 years |
| Median Income | $55,938 | $59,834 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 3.9 |
Population Comparison: Mc clure vs Lawrence
- The population in Lawrence is higher at 95,794, compared to 693 in Mc clure.
- Residents in Mc clure have a higher median age of 30.5 years compared to 28.8 years in Lawrence.
- Lawrence has a higher median income of $59,834, compared to $55,938 in Mc clure.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Mc clure at 37.0% compared to 32.0% in Lawrence.
- The poverty level is identical in both Mc clure and Lawrence at 12%.
- The unemployment rate in Mc clure is higher at 4.0%, compared to 3.9% in Lawrence.
Demographics
Demographics Mc clure vs Lawrence provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Mc clure | Lawrence |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 5 |
| White | 65 | 71 |
| Asian | 4 | 6 |
| Hispanic | 16 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 15 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Mc clure vs Lawrence
- In Lawrence, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 0% in Mc clure.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Lawrence at 71% compared to 65% in Mc clure.
- In Lawrence, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 4% in Mc clure.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Mc clure at 16% compared to 7% in Lawrence.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Mc clure at 15% compared to 9% in Lawrence.
- In Lawrence, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Mc clure.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Mc clure | Lawrence |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.4% | 16.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.5% | 9.5% |
| Depression | 22.4% | 22.3% |
| Smoking | 18.2% | 14.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.9% | 19.6% |
| Obesity | 40.2% | 32.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 22.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mc clure vs Lawrence
- In Lawrence, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.5% compared to 16.4% in Mc clure.
- Depression is more prevalent in Mc clure at 22.4% compared to 22.3% in Lawrence.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Mc clure at 18.2% compared to 14.8% in Lawrence.
- Binge drinking is more common in Mc clure at 19.9% compared to 19.6% in Lawrence.
- Obesity rates are higher in Mc clure at 40.2% compared to 32.8% in Lawrence.
- Disability percentages are higher in Mc clure at 22.0% compared to 10.0% in Lawrence.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Mc clure | Lawrence |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (2) | 0.5% (466) |
| High School Diploma | 28.6% (198) | 8.2% (7,882) |
| Less than High School | 17.7% (123) | 4.0% (3,784) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 5.5% (38) | 31.1% (29,776) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mc clure vs Lawrence
- In Lawrence, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.3% in Mc clure.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mc clure hold a high school diploma at 28.6% compared to 8.2% in Lawrence.
- More residents in Mc clure have less than a high school education at 17.7% compared to 4.0% in Lawrence.
- In Lawrence, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.1% compared to 5.5% in Mc clure.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.