Demographics details for Mayo, FL vs Cochranville, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Mayo, FL vs Cochranville, PA.
| Data | Mayo | Cochranville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,075 | 488 |
| Median Age | 30.8 years | 49.6 years |
| Median Income | $40,511 | $92,292 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 50.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Mayo vs Cochranville
- In Mayo, the population is higher at 1,075, compared to 488 in Cochranville.
- The median age in Cochranville is higher at 49.6 years, compared to 30.8 years in Mayo.
- Cochranville has a higher median income of $92,292, compared to $40,511 in Mayo.
- In Cochranville, the percentage of married families is higher at 50.0%, compared to 31.0% in Mayo.
- Mayo has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 5% in Cochranville.
- The unemployment rate in Mayo is higher at 4.5%, compared to 4.0% in Cochranville.
Demographics
Demographics Mayo vs Cochranville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Mayo | Cochranville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 63 | Data is updating |
| White | 9 | 90 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 19 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Mayo vs Cochranville
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Mayo at 63% compared to 0% in Cochranville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Cochranville at 90% compared to 9% in Mayo.
- Both Mayo and Cochranville have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Mayo at 19% compared to 6% in Cochranville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Mayo at 9% compared to 4% in Cochranville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Mayo and Cochranville at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Mayo | Cochranville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.6% | 17.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.6% | 12.3% |
| Depression | 20.4% | 24.1% |
| Smoking | 23.7% | 19.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.4% | 17.5% |
| Obesity | 37.1% | 35.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Mayo vs Cochranville
- More residents in Mayo report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 17.1% in Cochranville.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Cochranville at 24.1% versus 20.4% in Mayo.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Mayo at 23.7% compared to 19.8% in Cochranville.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Cochranville at 17.5% compared to 15.4% in Mayo.
- Obesity rates are higher in Mayo at 37.1% compared to 35.6% in Cochranville.
- Disability percentages are higher in Mayo at 19.0% compared to 8.0% in Cochranville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Mayo | Cochranville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 8.1% (87) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 29.1% (313) | 24.4% (119) |
| Less than High School | 20.7% (223) | 15.6% (76) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.2% (99) | 13.7% (67) |
Education Levels Comparison: Mayo vs Cochranville
- A higher percentage of residents in Mayo have no formal schooling at 8.1% compared to 0.0% in Cochranville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Mayo hold a high school diploma at 29.1% compared to 24.4% in Cochranville.
- More residents in Mayo have less than a high school education at 20.7% compared to 15.6% in Cochranville.
- In Cochranville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.7% compared to 9.2% in Mayo.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.