Demographics details for Maynard, IA vs Griffin, IN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Maynard, IA vs Griffin, IN.
| Data | Maynard | Griffin |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 470 | 142 |
| Median Age | 48.6 years | 31.7 years |
| Median Income | $44,091 | $61,250 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | Data is updating | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Maynard vs Griffin
- In Maynard, the population is higher at 470, compared to 142 in Griffin.
- Residents in Maynard have a higher median age of 48.6 years compared to 31.7 years in Griffin.
- Griffin has a higher median income of $61,250, compared to $44,091 in Maynard.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Maynard at 41.0% compared to 39.0% in Griffin.
- The poverty level is higher in Griffin at 8%, compared to 0% in Maynard.
- Griffin has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 0.0% in Maynard.
Demographics
Demographics Maynard vs Griffin provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Maynard | Griffin |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| White | 96 | 98 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 3 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Maynard vs Griffin
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Maynard and Griffin at 0%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Griffin at 98% compared to 96% in Maynard.
- Both Maynard and Griffin have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Maynard at 3% compared to 0% in Griffin.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Griffin at 2%, compared to 1% in Maynard.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Maynard and Griffin at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Maynard | Griffin |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.6% | 17.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.6% | 11.1% |
| Depression | 18.9% | 26.3% |
| Smoking | 17.4% | 18.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 21.7% | 17.4% |
| Obesity | 39.7% | 37.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Maynard vs Griffin
- In Griffin, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.2% compared to 15.6% in Maynard.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Griffin at 26.3% versus 18.9% in Maynard.
- Griffin has a higher smoking rate at 18.5% compared to 17.4% in Maynard.
- Binge drinking is more common in Maynard at 21.7% compared to 17.4% in Griffin.
- Obesity rates are higher in Maynard at 39.7% compared to 37.8% in Griffin.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Griffin at 14.0% compared to 11.0% in Maynard.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Maynard | Griffin |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (4) | 1.4% (2) |
| High School Diploma | 19.4% (91) | 16.9% (24) |
| Less than High School | 9.8% (46) | 9.9% (14) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.4% (77) | 12.0% (17) |
Education Levels Comparison: Maynard vs Griffin
- In Griffin, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.9% in Maynard.
- A higher percentage of residents in Maynard hold a high school diploma at 19.4% compared to 16.9% in Griffin.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Griffin at 9.9%, compared to 9.8% in Maynard.
- A higher percentage of residents in Maynard hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.4% compared to 12.0% in Griffin.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.