Demographics details for Maynard, IA vs Baldwin park, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Maynard, IA vs Baldwin park, CA.

Data Maynard Baldwin park
Population 470 69,455
Median Age 48.6 years 37.1 years
Median Income $44,091 $76,002
Married Families 41.0% 37.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating 12%
Unemployment Rate Data is updating 6.3

Population Comparison: Maynard vs Baldwin park

  • The population in Baldwin park is higher at 69,455, compared to 470 in Maynard.
  • Residents in Maynard have a higher median age of 48.6 years compared to 37.1 years in Baldwin park.
  • Baldwin park has a higher median income of $76,002, compared to $44,091 in Maynard.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Maynard at 41.0% compared to 37.0% in Baldwin park.
  • The poverty level is higher in Baldwin park at 12%, compared to 0% in Maynard.
  • Baldwin park has a higher unemployment rate at 6.3% compared to 0.0% in Maynard.

Demographics

Demographics Maynard vs Baldwin park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Maynard Baldwin park
Black Data is updating 1
White 96 -25
Asian Data is updating 23
Hispanic 3 75
Two or More Races 1 23
American Indian Data is updating 3

Demographics Comparison: Maynard vs Baldwin park

  • In Baldwin park, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Maynard.
  • Maynard has a higher percentage of White residents at 96% compared to -25% in Baldwin park.
  • In Baldwin park, the Asian population stands at 23%, greater than 0% in Maynard.
  • Baldwin park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 75%, compared to 3% in Maynard.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Baldwin park at 23%, compared to 1% in Maynard.
  • In Baldwin park, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 0% in Maynard.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Maynard Baldwin park
Mental Health Not Good 15.6% 15.4%
Physical Health Not Good 9.6% 12.7%
Depression 18.9% 14.7%
Smoking 17.4% 11.4%
Binge Drinking 21.7% 14.2%
Obesity 39.7% 29.9%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 10.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Maynard vs Baldwin park

  • More residents in Maynard report poor mental health at 15.6% compared to 15.4% in Baldwin park.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Maynard at 18.9% compared to 14.7% in Baldwin park.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Maynard at 17.4% compared to 11.4% in Baldwin park.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Maynard at 21.7% compared to 14.2% in Baldwin park.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Maynard at 39.7% compared to 29.9% in Baldwin park.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Maynard at 11.0% compared to 10.0% in Baldwin park.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Maynard Baldwin park
No Schooling 0.9% (4) 5.5% (3,853)
High School Diploma 19.4% (91) 18.1% (12,587)
Less than High School 9.8% (46) 41.7% (28,939)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 16.4% (77) 9.8% (6,787)

Education Levels Comparison: Maynard vs Baldwin park

  • In Baldwin park, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 5.5% compared to 0.9% in Maynard.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Maynard hold a high school diploma at 19.4% compared to 18.1% in Baldwin park.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Baldwin park at 41.7%, compared to 9.8% in Maynard.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Maynard hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.4% compared to 9.8% in Baldwin park.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.