Demographics details for Max meadows, VA vs Waycross, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Max meadows, VA vs Waycross, GA.
Data | Max meadows | Waycross |
---|---|---|
Population | 580 | 13,741 |
Median Age | 47.2 years | 34.7 years |
Median Income | $73,683 | $36,818 |
Married Families | 43.0% | 20.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | 21% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 6.5 |
Population Comparison: Max meadows vs Waycross
- The population in Waycross is higher at 13,741, compared to 580 in Max meadows.
- Residents in Max meadows have a higher median age of 47.2 years compared to 34.7 years in Waycross.
- Max meadows has a higher median income of $73,683 compared to $36,818 in Waycross.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Max meadows at 43.0% compared to 20.0% in Waycross.
- The poverty level is higher in Waycross at 21%, compared to 5% in Max meadows.
- Waycross has a higher unemployment rate at 6.5% compared to 3.5% in Max meadows.
Demographics
Demographics Max meadows vs Waycross provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Max meadows | Waycross |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 56 |
White | 98 | 32 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | Data is updating | 6 |
Two or More Races | 2 | 6 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Max meadows vs Waycross
- In Waycross, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 56% compared to 0% in Max meadows.
- Max meadows has a higher percentage of White residents at 98% compared to 32% in Waycross.
- Both Max meadows and Waycross have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Waycross has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 0% in Max meadows.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Waycross at 6%, compared to 2% in Max meadows.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Max meadows and Waycross at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Max meadows | Waycross |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.9% | 19.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.6% | 15.7% |
Depression | 26.2% | 21.6% |
Smoking | 20.4% | 23.2% |
Binge Drinking | 17.9% | 12.9% |
Obesity | 40.3% | 45.7% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Max meadows vs Waycross
- In Waycross, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 18.9% in Max meadows.
- Depression is more prevalent in Max meadows at 26.2% compared to 21.6% in Waycross.
- Waycross has a higher smoking rate at 23.2% compared to 20.4% in Max meadows.
- Binge drinking is more common in Max meadows at 17.9% compared to 12.9% in Waycross.
- Waycross has higher obesity rates at 45.7% compared to 40.3% in Max meadows.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Waycross at 12.0% compared to 9.0% in Max meadows.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Max meadows | Waycross |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.2% (166) |
High School Diploma | 37.1% (215) | 19.8% (2,727) |
Less than High School | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 15.5% (2,123) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.8% (57) | 11.4% (1,561) |
Education Levels Comparison: Max meadows vs Waycross
- In Waycross, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.0% in Max meadows.
- A higher percentage of residents in Max meadows hold a high school diploma at 37.1% compared to 19.8% in Waycross.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Waycross at 15.5%, compared to 0.0% in Max meadows.
- In Waycross, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.4% compared to 9.8% in Max meadows.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.