Demographics details for Max meadows, VA vs Aberdeen, WA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Max meadows, VA vs Aberdeen, WA.

Data Max meadows Aberdeen
Population 580 17,113
Median Age 47.2 years 37.1 years
Median Income $73,683 $50,008
Married Families 43.0% 29.0%
Poverty Level 5% 18%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 5.2

Population Comparison: Max meadows vs Aberdeen

  • The population in Aberdeen is higher at 17,113, compared to 580 in Max meadows.
  • Residents in Max meadows have a higher median age of 47.2 years compared to 37.1 years in Aberdeen.
  • Max meadows has a higher median income of $73,683 compared to $50,008 in Aberdeen.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Max meadows at 43.0% compared to 29.0% in Aberdeen.
  • The poverty level is higher in Aberdeen at 18%, compared to 5% in Max meadows.
  • Aberdeen has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 3.5% in Max meadows.

Demographics

Demographics Max meadows vs Aberdeen provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Max meadows Aberdeen
Black Data is updating 1
White 98 63
Asian Data is updating 1
Hispanic Data is updating 21
Two or More Races 2 12
American Indian Data is updating 2

Demographics Comparison: Max meadows vs Aberdeen

  • In Aberdeen, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Max meadows.
  • Max meadows has a higher percentage of White residents at 98% compared to 63% in Aberdeen.
  • In Aberdeen, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Max meadows.
  • Aberdeen has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 21%, compared to 0% in Max meadows.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Aberdeen at 12%, compared to 2% in Max meadows.
  • In Aberdeen, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Max meadows.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Max meadows Aberdeen
Mental Health Not Good 18.9% 20.2%
Physical Health Not Good 12.6% 14.2%
Depression 26.2% 29.4%
Smoking 20.4% 19.2%
Binge Drinking 17.9% 16.0%
Obesity 40.3% 35.6%
Disability Percentage 9.0% 22.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Max meadows vs Aberdeen

  • In Aberdeen, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.2% compared to 18.9% in Max meadows.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Aberdeen at 29.4% versus 26.2% in Max meadows.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Max meadows at 20.4% compared to 19.2% in Aberdeen.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Max meadows at 17.9% compared to 16.0% in Aberdeen.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Max meadows at 40.3% compared to 35.6% in Aberdeen.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Aberdeen at 22.0% compared to 9.0% in Max meadows.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Max meadows Aberdeen
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 1.5% (261)
High School Diploma 37.1% (215) 15.7% (2,683)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 19.2% (3,285)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 9.8% (57) 10.8% (1,840)

Education Levels Comparison: Max meadows vs Aberdeen

  • In Aberdeen, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.0% in Max meadows.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Max meadows hold a high school diploma at 37.1% compared to 15.7% in Aberdeen.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Aberdeen at 19.2%, compared to 0.0% in Max meadows.
  • In Aberdeen, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.8% compared to 9.8% in Max meadows.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.