Demographics details for Matheson, CO vs Palos park, IL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Matheson, CO vs Palos park, IL.

Data Matheson Palos park
Population 712 4,792
Median Age 34.0 years 59.5 years
Median Income $65,000 $128,370
Married Families 45.0% 60.0%
Poverty Level 10% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 4.0 5.0

Population Comparison: Matheson vs Palos park

  • The population in Palos park is higher at 4,792, compared to 712 in Matheson.
  • The median age in Palos park is higher at 59.5 years, compared to 34.0 years in Matheson.
  • Palos park has a higher median income of $128,370, compared to $65,000 in Matheson.
  • In Palos park, the percentage of married families is higher at 60.0%, compared to 45.0% in Matheson.
  • Matheson has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 0% in Palos park.
  • Palos park has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 4.0% in Matheson.

Demographics

Demographics Matheson vs Palos park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Matheson Palos park
Black Data is updating 3
White 90 88
Asian Data is updating 1
Hispanic 10 3
Two or More Races Data is updating 5
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Matheson vs Palos park

  • In Palos park, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 0% in Matheson.
  • Matheson has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to 88% in Palos park.
  • In Palos park, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Matheson.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Matheson at 10% compared to 3% in Palos park.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Palos park at 5%, compared to 0% in Matheson.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Matheson and Palos park at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Matheson Palos park
Mental Health Not Good Data is updating% 13.2%
Physical Health Not Good Data is updating% 8.4%
Depression Data is updating% 18.5%
Smoking Data is updating% 11.5%
Binge Drinking Data is updating% 20.8%
Obesity Data is updating% 26.7%
Disability Percentage Data is updating% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Matheson vs Palos park

  • In Palos park, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 13.2% compared to 0.0% in Matheson.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Palos park at 18.5% versus 0.0% in Matheson.
  • Palos park has a higher smoking rate at 11.5% compared to 0.0% in Matheson.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Palos park at 20.8% compared to 0.0% in Matheson.
  • Palos park has higher obesity rates at 26.7% compared to 0.0% in Matheson.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Palos park at 9.0% compared to 0.0% in Matheson.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Matheson Palos park
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 1.1% (54)
High School Diploma 0.0% (Data is updating) 18.2% (870)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 6.0% (287)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 0.0% (Data is updating) 42.1% (2,018)

Education Levels Comparison: Matheson vs Palos park

  • In Palos park, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.0% in Matheson.
  • In Palos park, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.2% compared to 0.0% in Matheson.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Palos park at 6.0%, compared to 0.0% in Matheson.
  • In Palos park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 42.1% compared to 0.0% in Matheson.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.