Demographics details for Massapequa park, NY vs Waterman, IL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Massapequa park, NY vs Waterman, IL.

Data Massapequa park Waterman
Population 16,873 1,427
Median Age 43.7 years 36.2 years
Median Income $161,193 $87,292
Married Families 52.0% 50.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating 6%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 4.1

Population Comparison: Massapequa park vs Waterman

  • In Massapequa park, the population is higher at 16,873, compared to 1,427 in Waterman.
  • Residents in Massapequa park have a higher median age of 43.7 years compared to 36.2 years in Waterman.
  • Massapequa park has a higher median income of $161,193 compared to $87,292 in Waterman.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Massapequa park at 52.0% compared to 50.0% in Waterman.
  • The poverty level is higher in Waterman at 6%, compared to 0% in Massapequa park.
  • Waterman has a higher unemployment rate at 4.1% compared to 3.5% in Massapequa park.

Demographics

Demographics Massapequa park vs Waterman provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Massapequa park Waterman
Black 1 2
White 88 78
Asian 2 1
Hispanic 5 10
Two or More Races 4 9
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Massapequa park vs Waterman

  • In Waterman, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 1% in Massapequa park.
  • Massapequa park has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 78% in Waterman.
  • The Asian population is larger in Massapequa park at 2% compared to 1% in Waterman.
  • Waterman has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 10%, compared to 5% in Massapequa park.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Waterman at 9%, compared to 4% in Massapequa park.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Massapequa park and Waterman at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Massapequa park Waterman
Mental Health Not Good 13.7% 16.0%
Physical Health Not Good 8.0% 10.4%
Depression 17.9% 21.6%
Smoking 11.5% 16.2%
Binge Drinking 19.2% 18.7%
Obesity 26.4% 36.4%
Disability Percentage 9.0% 10.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Massapequa park vs Waterman

  • In Waterman, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.0% compared to 13.7% in Massapequa park.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Waterman at 21.6% versus 17.9% in Massapequa park.
  • Waterman has a higher smoking rate at 16.2% compared to 11.5% in Massapequa park.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Massapequa park at 19.2% compared to 18.7% in Waterman.
  • Waterman has higher obesity rates at 36.4% compared to 26.4% in Massapequa park.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Waterman at 10.0% compared to 9.0% in Massapequa park.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Massapequa park Waterman
No Schooling 0.3% (45) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 15.3% (2,586) 22.6% (323)
Less than High School 3.8% (641) 8.5% (122)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 36.6% (6,183) 15.5% (221)

Education Levels Comparison: Massapequa park vs Waterman

  • A higher percentage of residents in Massapequa park have no formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.0% in Waterman.
  • In Waterman, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.6% compared to 15.3% in Massapequa park.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Waterman at 8.5%, compared to 3.8% in Massapequa park.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Massapequa park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.6% compared to 15.5% in Waterman.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.