Demographics details for Massapequa park, NY vs Torrington, CT

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Massapequa park, NY vs Torrington, CT.

Data Massapequa park Torrington
Population 16,873 35,563
Median Age 43.7 years 40.8 years
Median Income $161,193 $66,616
Married Families 52.0% 35.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating 9%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 2.8

Population Comparison: Massapequa park vs Torrington

  • The population in Torrington is higher at 35,563, compared to 16,873 in Massapequa park.
  • Residents in Massapequa park have a higher median age of 43.7 years compared to 40.8 years in Torrington.
  • Massapequa park has a higher median income of $161,193 compared to $66,616 in Torrington.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Massapequa park at 52.0% compared to 35.0% in Torrington.
  • The poverty level is higher in Torrington at 9%, compared to 0% in Massapequa park.
  • The unemployment rate in Massapequa park is higher at 3.5%, compared to 2.8% in Torrington.

Demographics

Demographics Massapequa park vs Torrington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Massapequa park Torrington
Black 1 10
White 88 61
Asian 2 3
Hispanic 5 17
Two or More Races 4 9
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Massapequa park vs Torrington

  • In Torrington, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 10% compared to 1% in Massapequa park.
  • Massapequa park has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 61% in Torrington.
  • In Torrington, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 2% in Massapequa park.
  • Torrington has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 17%, compared to 5% in Massapequa park.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Torrington at 9%, compared to 4% in Massapequa park.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Massapequa park and Torrington at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Massapequa park Torrington
Mental Health Not Good 13.7% 16.2%
Physical Health Not Good 8.0% 10.5%
Depression 17.9% 23.3%
Smoking 11.5% 16.0%
Binge Drinking 19.2% 16.6%
Obesity 26.4% 28.8%
Disability Percentage 9.0% 15.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Massapequa park vs Torrington

  • In Torrington, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.2% compared to 13.7% in Massapequa park.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Torrington at 23.3% versus 17.9% in Massapequa park.
  • Torrington has a higher smoking rate at 16.0% compared to 11.5% in Massapequa park.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Massapequa park at 19.2% compared to 16.6% in Torrington.
  • Torrington has higher obesity rates at 28.8% compared to 26.4% in Massapequa park.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Torrington at 15.0% compared to 9.0% in Massapequa park.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Massapequa park Torrington
No Schooling 0.3% (45) 1.2% (425)
High School Diploma 15.3% (2,586) 22.6% (8,040)
Less than High School 3.8% (641) 16.1% (5,736)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 36.6% (6,183) 17.7% (6,279)

Education Levels Comparison: Massapequa park vs Torrington

  • In Torrington, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.3% in Massapequa park.
  • In Torrington, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.6% compared to 15.3% in Massapequa park.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Torrington at 16.1%, compared to 3.8% in Massapequa park.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Massapequa park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.6% compared to 17.7% in Torrington.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.