Demographics details for Massapequa park, NY vs Tallulah, LA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Massapequa park, NY vs Tallulah, LA.

Data Massapequa park Tallulah
Population 16,873 5,946
Median Age 43.7 years 35.1 years
Median Income $161,193 $31,070
Married Families 52.0% 21.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating 25%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 5.0

Population Comparison: Massapequa park vs Tallulah

  • In Massapequa park, the population is higher at 16,873, compared to 5,946 in Tallulah.
  • Residents in Massapequa park have a higher median age of 43.7 years compared to 35.1 years in Tallulah.
  • Massapequa park has a higher median income of $161,193 compared to $31,070 in Tallulah.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Massapequa park at 52.0% compared to 21.0% in Tallulah.
  • The poverty level is higher in Tallulah at 25%, compared to 0% in Massapequa park.
  • Tallulah has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 3.5% in Massapequa park.

Demographics

Demographics Massapequa park vs Tallulah provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Massapequa park Tallulah
Black 1 86
White 88 11
Asian 2 Data is updating
Hispanic 5 1
Two or More Races 4 2
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Massapequa park vs Tallulah

  • In Tallulah, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 86% compared to 1% in Massapequa park.
  • Massapequa park has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 11% in Tallulah.
  • The Asian population is larger in Massapequa park at 2% compared to 0% in Tallulah.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Massapequa park at 5% compared to 1% in Tallulah.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Massapequa park at 4% compared to 2% in Tallulah.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Massapequa park and Tallulah at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Massapequa park Tallulah
Mental Health Not Good 13.7% 24.5%
Physical Health Not Good 8.0% 19.5%
Depression 17.9% 26.5%
Smoking 11.5% 32.8%
Binge Drinking 19.2% 12.7%
Obesity 26.4% 49.5%
Disability Percentage 9.0% 20.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Massapequa park vs Tallulah

  • In Tallulah, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 24.5% compared to 13.7% in Massapequa park.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Tallulah at 26.5% versus 17.9% in Massapequa park.
  • Tallulah has a higher smoking rate at 32.8% compared to 11.5% in Massapequa park.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Massapequa park at 19.2% compared to 12.7% in Tallulah.
  • Tallulah has higher obesity rates at 49.5% compared to 26.4% in Massapequa park.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Tallulah at 20.0% compared to 9.0% in Massapequa park.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Massapequa park Tallulah
No Schooling 0.3% (45) 1.4% (84)
High School Diploma 15.3% (2,586) 18.8% (1,115)
Less than High School 3.8% (641) 15.4% (916)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 36.6% (6,183) 9.3% (555)

Education Levels Comparison: Massapequa park vs Tallulah

  • In Tallulah, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.3% in Massapequa park.
  • In Tallulah, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.8% compared to 15.3% in Massapequa park.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Tallulah at 15.4%, compared to 3.8% in Massapequa park.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Massapequa park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.6% compared to 9.3% in Tallulah.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.