Demographics details for Massapequa park, NY vs South gate, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Massapequa park, NY vs South gate, CA.
Data | Massapequa park | South gate |
---|---|---|
Population | 16,873 | 90,926 |
Median Age | 43.7 years | 33.7 years |
Median Income | $161,193 | $67,188 |
Married Families | 52.0% | 34.0% |
Poverty Level | Data is updating | 18% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 6.1 |
Population Comparison: Massapequa park vs South gate
- The population in South gate is higher at 90,926, compared to 16,873 in Massapequa park.
- Residents in Massapequa park have a higher median age of 43.7 years compared to 33.7 years in South gate.
- Massapequa park has a higher median income of $161,193 compared to $67,188 in South gate.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Massapequa park at 52.0% compared to 34.0% in South gate.
- The poverty level is higher in South gate at 18%, compared to 0% in Massapequa park.
- South gate has a higher unemployment rate at 6.1% compared to 3.5% in Massapequa park.
Demographics
Demographics Massapequa park vs South gate provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Massapequa park | South gate |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 1 |
White | 88 | -21 |
Asian | 2 | 1 |
Hispanic | 5 | 97 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 21 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Massapequa park vs South gate
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Massapequa park and South gate at 1%.
- Massapequa park has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to -21% in South gate.
- The Asian population is larger in Massapequa park at 2% compared to 1% in South gate.
- South gate has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 97%, compared to 5% in Massapequa park.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in South gate at 21%, compared to 4% in Massapequa park.
- In South gate, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Massapequa park.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Massapequa park | South gate |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 13.7% | 16.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.0% | 14.9% |
Depression | 17.9% | 16.3% |
Smoking | 11.5% | 12.7% |
Binge Drinking | 19.2% | 14.5% |
Obesity | 26.4% | 34.1% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Massapequa park vs South gate
- In South gate, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.8% compared to 13.7% in Massapequa park.
- Depression is more prevalent in Massapequa park at 17.9% compared to 16.3% in South gate.
- South gate has a higher smoking rate at 12.7% compared to 11.5% in Massapequa park.
- Binge drinking is more common in Massapequa park at 19.2% compared to 14.5% in South gate.
- South gate has higher obesity rates at 34.1% compared to 26.4% in Massapequa park.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Massapequa park and South gate at 9.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Massapequa park | South gate |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.3% (45) | 4.6% (4,160) |
High School Diploma | 15.3% (2,586) | 14.9% (13,536) |
Less than High School | 3.8% (641) | 53.3% (48,481) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 36.6% (6,183) | 7.5% (6,822) |
Education Levels Comparison: Massapequa park vs South gate
- In South gate, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 4.6% compared to 0.3% in Massapequa park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Massapequa park hold a high school diploma at 15.3% compared to 14.9% in South gate.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in South gate at 53.3%, compared to 3.8% in Massapequa park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Massapequa park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.6% compared to 7.5% in South gate.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.