Demographics details for Massapequa park, NY vs Shelby, IA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Massapequa park, NY vs Shelby, IA.

Data Massapequa park Shelby
Population 16,873 11,645
Median Age 43.7 years 45.5 years
Median Income $161,193 $70,295
Married Families 52.0% 47.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating 9%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 2.5

Population Comparison: Massapequa park vs Shelby

  • In Massapequa park, the population is higher at 16,873, compared to 11,645 in Shelby.
  • The median age in Shelby is higher at 45.5 years, compared to 43.7 years in Massapequa park.
  • Massapequa park has a higher median income of $161,193 compared to $70,295 in Shelby.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Massapequa park at 52.0% compared to 47.0% in Shelby.
  • The poverty level is higher in Shelby at 9%, compared to 0% in Massapequa park.
  • The unemployment rate in Massapequa park is higher at 3.5%, compared to 2.5% in Shelby.

Demographics

Demographics Massapequa park vs Shelby provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Massapequa park Shelby
Black 1 1
White 88 93
Asian 2 Data is updating
Hispanic 5 3
Two or More Races 4 3
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Massapequa park vs Shelby

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Massapequa park and Shelby at 1%.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Shelby at 93% compared to 88% in Massapequa park.
  • The Asian population is larger in Massapequa park at 2% compared to 0% in Shelby.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Massapequa park at 5% compared to 3% in Shelby.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Massapequa park at 4% compared to 3% in Shelby.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Massapequa park and Shelby at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Massapequa park Shelby
Mental Health Not Good 13.7% 15.2%
Physical Health Not Good 8.0% 9.5%
Depression 17.9% 18.1%
Smoking 11.5% 17.2%
Binge Drinking 19.2% 22.5%
Obesity 26.4% 36.7%
Disability Percentage 9.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Massapequa park vs Shelby

  • In Shelby, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.2% compared to 13.7% in Massapequa park.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Shelby at 18.1% versus 17.9% in Massapequa park.
  • Shelby has a higher smoking rate at 17.2% compared to 11.5% in Massapequa park.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Shelby at 22.5% compared to 19.2% in Massapequa park.
  • Shelby has higher obesity rates at 36.7% compared to 26.4% in Massapequa park.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Shelby at 11.0% compared to 9.0% in Massapequa park.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Massapequa park Shelby
No Schooling 0.3% (45) 0.6% (72)
High School Diploma 15.3% (2,586) 22.7% (2,641)
Less than High School 3.8% (641) 8.1% (941)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 36.6% (6,183) 16.3% (1,898)

Education Levels Comparison: Massapequa park vs Shelby

  • In Shelby, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.3% in Massapequa park.
  • In Shelby, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.7% compared to 15.3% in Massapequa park.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Shelby at 8.1%, compared to 3.8% in Massapequa park.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Massapequa park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.6% compared to 16.3% in Shelby.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.