Demographics details for Massapequa park, NY vs Lancaster, VA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Massapequa park, NY vs Lancaster, VA.
| Data | Massapequa park | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 16,873 | 10,750 |
| Median Age | 43.7 years | 59.2 years |
| Median Income | $161,193 | $62,674 |
| Married Families | 52.0% | 46.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.1 |
Population Comparison: Massapequa park vs Lancaster
- In Massapequa park, the population is higher at 16,873, compared to 10,750 in Lancaster.
- The median age in Lancaster is higher at 59.2 years, compared to 43.7 years in Massapequa park.
- Massapequa park has a higher median income of $161,193 compared to $62,674 in Lancaster.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Massapequa park at 52.0% compared to 46.0% in Lancaster.
- The poverty level is higher in Lancaster at 10%, compared to 0% in Massapequa park.
- The unemployment rate in Massapequa park is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.1% in Lancaster.
Demographics
Demographics Massapequa park vs Lancaster provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Massapequa park | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 28 |
| White | 88 | 66 |
| Asian | 2 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Massapequa park vs Lancaster
- In Lancaster, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 28% compared to 1% in Massapequa park.
- Massapequa park has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 66% in Lancaster.
- The Asian population is larger in Massapequa park at 2% compared to 1% in Lancaster.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Massapequa park at 5% compared to 2% in Lancaster.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Massapequa park at 4% compared to 3% in Lancaster.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Massapequa park and Lancaster at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Massapequa park | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.7% | 16.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.0% | 10.6% |
| Depression | 17.9% | 22.2% |
| Smoking | 11.5% | 16.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.2% | 16.3% |
| Obesity | 26.4% | 37.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Massapequa park vs Lancaster
- In Lancaster, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.4% compared to 13.7% in Massapequa park.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Lancaster at 22.2% versus 17.9% in Massapequa park.
- Lancaster has a higher smoking rate at 16.4% compared to 11.5% in Massapequa park.
- Binge drinking is more common in Massapequa park at 19.2% compared to 16.3% in Lancaster.
- Lancaster has higher obesity rates at 37.3% compared to 26.4% in Massapequa park.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Lancaster at 17.0% compared to 9.0% in Massapequa park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Massapequa park | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (45) | 1.5% (164) |
| High School Diploma | 15.3% (2,586) | 20.9% (2,244) |
| Less than High School | 3.8% (641) | 17.0% (1,823) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 36.6% (6,183) | 26.3% (2,823) |
Education Levels Comparison: Massapequa park vs Lancaster
- In Lancaster, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.3% in Massapequa park.
- In Lancaster, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.9% compared to 15.3% in Massapequa park.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lancaster at 17.0%, compared to 3.8% in Massapequa park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Massapequa park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.6% compared to 26.3% in Lancaster.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.