Demographics details for Massapequa park, NY vs Lancaster, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Massapequa park, NY vs Lancaster, OH.
| Data | Massapequa park | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 16,873 | 41,174 |
| Median Age | 43.7 years | 38.4 years |
| Median Income | $161,193 | $52,716 |
| Married Families | 52.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Massapequa park vs Lancaster
- The population in Lancaster is higher at 41,174, compared to 16,873 in Massapequa park.
- Residents in Massapequa park have a higher median age of 43.7 years compared to 38.4 years in Lancaster.
- Massapequa park has a higher median income of $161,193 compared to $52,716 in Lancaster.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Massapequa park at 52.0% compared to 34.0% in Lancaster.
- The poverty level is higher in Lancaster at 12%, compared to 0% in Massapequa park.
- Lancaster has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 3.5% in Massapequa park.
Demographics
Demographics Massapequa park vs Lancaster provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Massapequa park | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 1 |
| White | 88 | 92 |
| Asian | 2 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Massapequa park vs Lancaster
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Massapequa park and Lancaster at 1%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Lancaster at 92% compared to 88% in Massapequa park.
- The Asian population is larger in Massapequa park at 2% compared to 1% in Lancaster.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Massapequa park at 5% compared to 2% in Lancaster.
- Both Massapequa park and Lancaster have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 4%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Massapequa park and Lancaster at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Massapequa park | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.7% | 19.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.0% | 13.6% |
| Depression | 17.9% | 26.1% |
| Smoking | 11.5% | 23.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.2% | 19.2% |
| Obesity | 26.4% | 46.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Massapequa park vs Lancaster
- In Lancaster, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 13.7% in Massapequa park.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Lancaster at 26.1% versus 17.9% in Massapequa park.
- Lancaster has a higher smoking rate at 23.5% compared to 11.5% in Massapequa park.
- Binge drinking rates are similar in both Massapequa park and Lancaster at 19.2%.
- Lancaster has higher obesity rates at 46.7% compared to 26.4% in Massapequa park.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Lancaster at 19.0% compared to 9.0% in Massapequa park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Massapequa park | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (45) | 0.3% (125) |
| High School Diploma | 15.3% (2,586) | 25.5% (10,487) |
| Less than High School | 3.8% (641) | 10.7% (4,399) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 36.6% (6,183) | 13.9% (5,740) |
Education Levels Comparison: Massapequa park vs Lancaster
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Massapequa park and Lancaster at 0.3%.
- In Lancaster, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.5% compared to 15.3% in Massapequa park.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lancaster at 10.7%, compared to 3.8% in Massapequa park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Massapequa park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.6% compared to 13.9% in Lancaster.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.