Demographics details for Massapequa park, NY vs Fresno, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Massapequa park, NY vs Fresno, CA.
| Data | Massapequa park | Fresno |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 16,873 | 545,567 |
| Median Age | 43.7 years | 32.1 years |
| Median Income | $161,193 | $63,001 |
| Married Families | 52.0% | 30.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 20% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 6.6 |
Population Comparison: Massapequa park vs Fresno
- The population in Fresno is higher at 545,567, compared to 16,873 in Massapequa park.
- Residents in Massapequa park have a higher median age of 43.7 years compared to 32.1 years in Fresno.
- Massapequa park has a higher median income of $161,193 compared to $63,001 in Fresno.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Massapequa park at 52.0% compared to 30.0% in Fresno.
- The poverty level is higher in Fresno at 20%, compared to 0% in Massapequa park.
- Fresno has a higher unemployment rate at 6.6% compared to 3.5% in Massapequa park.
Demographics
Demographics Massapequa park vs Fresno provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Massapequa park | Fresno |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 7 |
| White | 88 | 10 |
| Asian | 2 | 14 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 50 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 18 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Massapequa park vs Fresno
- In Fresno, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 7% compared to 1% in Massapequa park.
- Massapequa park has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 10% in Fresno.
- In Fresno, the Asian population stands at 14%, greater than 2% in Massapequa park.
- Fresno has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 50%, compared to 5% in Massapequa park.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fresno at 18%, compared to 4% in Massapequa park.
- In Fresno, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Massapequa park.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Massapequa park | Fresno |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.7% | 17.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.0% | 13.6% |
| Depression | 17.9% | 17.6% |
| Smoking | 11.5% | 15.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.2% | 13.7% |
| Obesity | 26.4% | 37.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Massapequa park vs Fresno
- In Fresno, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.7% compared to 13.7% in Massapequa park.
- Depression is more prevalent in Massapequa park at 17.9% compared to 17.6% in Fresno.
- Fresno has a higher smoking rate at 15.5% compared to 11.5% in Massapequa park.
- Binge drinking is more common in Massapequa park at 19.2% compared to 13.7% in Fresno.
- Fresno has higher obesity rates at 37.3% compared to 26.4% in Massapequa park.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fresno at 14.0% compared to 9.0% in Massapequa park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Massapequa park | Fresno |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (45) | 2.8% (15,183) |
| High School Diploma | 15.3% (2,586) | 11.6% (63,519) |
| Less than High School | 3.8% (641) | 22.1% (120,693) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 36.6% (6,183) | 14.9% (81,421) |
Education Levels Comparison: Massapequa park vs Fresno
- In Fresno, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.8% compared to 0.3% in Massapequa park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Massapequa park hold a high school diploma at 15.3% compared to 11.6% in Fresno.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fresno at 22.1%, compared to 3.8% in Massapequa park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Massapequa park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.6% compared to 14.9% in Fresno.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.