Demographics details for Massapequa park, NY vs Fairburn, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Massapequa park, NY vs Fairburn, GA.
| Data | Massapequa park | Fairburn |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 16,873 | 16,956 |
| Median Age | 43.7 years | 30.9 years |
| Median Income | $161,193 | $67,245 |
| Married Families | 52.0% | 20.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Massapequa park vs Fairburn
- The population in Fairburn is higher at 16,956, compared to 16,873 in Massapequa park.
- Residents in Massapequa park have a higher median age of 43.7 years compared to 30.9 years in Fairburn.
- Massapequa park has a higher median income of $161,193 compared to $67,245 in Fairburn.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Massapequa park at 52.0% compared to 20.0% in Fairburn.
- The poverty level is higher in Fairburn at 15%, compared to 0% in Massapequa park.
- Fairburn has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.5% in Massapequa park.
Demographics
Demographics Massapequa park vs Fairburn provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Massapequa park | Fairburn |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 73 |
| White | 88 | 12 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 5 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Massapequa park vs Fairburn
- In Fairburn, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 73% compared to 1% in Massapequa park.
- Massapequa park has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 12% in Fairburn.
- The Asian population is larger in Massapequa park at 2% compared to 0% in Fairburn.
- Fairburn has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 5% in Massapequa park.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Massapequa park at 4% compared to 3% in Fairburn.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Massapequa park and Fairburn at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Massapequa park | Fairburn |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.7% | 15.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.0% | 10.9% |
| Depression | 17.9% | 16.8% |
| Smoking | 11.5% | 15.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.2% | 15.0% |
| Obesity | 26.4% | 33.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Massapequa park vs Fairburn
- In Fairburn, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.4% compared to 13.7% in Massapequa park.
- Depression is more prevalent in Massapequa park at 17.9% compared to 16.8% in Fairburn.
- Fairburn has a higher smoking rate at 15.6% compared to 11.5% in Massapequa park.
- Binge drinking is more common in Massapequa park at 19.2% compared to 15.0% in Fairburn.
- Fairburn has higher obesity rates at 33.7% compared to 26.4% in Massapequa park.
- Disability percentages are higher in Massapequa park at 9.0% compared to 7.0% in Fairburn.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Massapequa park | Fairburn |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (45) | 0.5% (78) |
| High School Diploma | 15.3% (2,586) | 12.3% (2,082) |
| Less than High School | 3.8% (641) | 5.7% (961) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 36.6% (6,183) | 21.2% (3,591) |
Education Levels Comparison: Massapequa park vs Fairburn
- In Fairburn, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.3% in Massapequa park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Massapequa park hold a high school diploma at 15.3% compared to 12.3% in Fairburn.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fairburn at 5.7%, compared to 3.8% in Massapequa park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Massapequa park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.6% compared to 21.2% in Fairburn.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.