Demographics details for Massapequa park, NY vs Corcoran, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Massapequa park, NY vs Corcoran, CA.

Data Massapequa park Corcoran
Population 16,873 22,837
Median Age 43.7 years 34.0 years
Median Income $161,193 $53,103
Married Families 52.0% 25.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating 20%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 16.7

Population Comparison: Massapequa park vs Corcoran

  • The population in Corcoran is higher at 22,837, compared to 16,873 in Massapequa park.
  • Residents in Massapequa park have a higher median age of 43.7 years compared to 34.0 years in Corcoran.
  • Massapequa park has a higher median income of $161,193 compared to $53,103 in Corcoran.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Massapequa park at 52.0% compared to 25.0% in Corcoran.
  • The poverty level is higher in Corcoran at 20%, compared to 0% in Massapequa park.
  • Corcoran has a higher unemployment rate at 16.7% compared to 3.5% in Massapequa park.

Demographics

Demographics Massapequa park vs Corcoran provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Massapequa park Corcoran
Black 1 10
White 88 -8
Asian 2 1
Hispanic 5 74
Two or More Races 4 20
American Indian Data is updating 3

Demographics Comparison: Massapequa park vs Corcoran

  • In Corcoran, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 10% compared to 1% in Massapequa park.
  • Massapequa park has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to -8% in Corcoran.
  • The Asian population is larger in Massapequa park at 2% compared to 1% in Corcoran.
  • Corcoran has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 74%, compared to 5% in Massapequa park.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Corcoran at 20%, compared to 4% in Massapequa park.
  • In Corcoran, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 0% in Massapequa park.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Massapequa park Corcoran
Mental Health Not Good 13.7% 18.5%
Physical Health Not Good 8.0% 17.8%
Depression 17.9% 17.4%
Smoking 11.5% 22.0%
Binge Drinking 19.2% 15.5%
Obesity 26.4% 40.7%
Disability Percentage 9.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Massapequa park vs Corcoran

  • In Corcoran, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 13.7% in Massapequa park.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Massapequa park at 17.9% compared to 17.4% in Corcoran.
  • Corcoran has a higher smoking rate at 22.0% compared to 11.5% in Massapequa park.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Massapequa park at 19.2% compared to 15.5% in Corcoran.
  • Corcoran has higher obesity rates at 40.7% compared to 26.4% in Massapequa park.
  • Disability percentages are the same in both Massapequa park and Corcoran at 9.0%.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Massapequa park Corcoran
No Schooling 0.3% (45) 1.5% (343)
High School Diploma 15.3% (2,586) 16.3% (3,728)
Less than High School 3.8% (641) 53.2% (12,144)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 36.6% (6,183) 2.7% (612)

Education Levels Comparison: Massapequa park vs Corcoran

  • In Corcoran, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.3% in Massapequa park.
  • In Corcoran, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.3% compared to 15.3% in Massapequa park.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Corcoran at 53.2%, compared to 3.8% in Massapequa park.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Massapequa park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.6% compared to 2.7% in Corcoran.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.