Demographics details for Massapequa park, NY vs Columbia, SC

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Massapequa park, NY vs Columbia, SC.

Data Massapequa park Columbia
Population 16,873 139,698
Median Age 43.7 years 28.3 years
Median Income $161,193 $54,095
Married Families 52.0% 25.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating 17%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 5.8

Population Comparison: Massapequa park vs Columbia

  • The population in Columbia is higher at 139,698, compared to 16,873 in Massapequa park.
  • Residents in Massapequa park have a higher median age of 43.7 years compared to 28.3 years in Columbia.
  • Massapequa park has a higher median income of $161,193 compared to $54,095 in Columbia.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Massapequa park at 52.0% compared to 25.0% in Columbia.
  • The poverty level is higher in Columbia at 17%, compared to 0% in Massapequa park.
  • Columbia has a higher unemployment rate at 5.8% compared to 3.5% in Massapequa park.

Demographics

Demographics Massapequa park vs Columbia provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Massapequa park Columbia
Black 1 40
White 88 48
Asian 2 2
Hispanic 5 5
Two or More Races 4 5
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Massapequa park vs Columbia

  • In Columbia, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 40% compared to 1% in Massapequa park.
  • Massapequa park has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 48% in Columbia.
  • Both Massapequa park and Columbia have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
  • The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Massapequa park and Columbia at 5%.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Columbia at 5%, compared to 4% in Massapequa park.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Massapequa park and Columbia at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Massapequa park Columbia
Mental Health Not Good 13.7% 18.6%
Physical Health Not Good 8.0% 13.1%
Depression 17.9% 20.8%
Smoking 11.5% 19.1%
Binge Drinking 19.2% 18.1%
Obesity 26.4% 39.0%
Disability Percentage 9.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Massapequa park vs Columbia

  • In Columbia, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 13.7% in Massapequa park.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Columbia at 20.8% versus 17.9% in Massapequa park.
  • Columbia has a higher smoking rate at 19.1% compared to 11.5% in Massapequa park.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Massapequa park at 19.2% compared to 18.1% in Columbia.
  • Columbia has higher obesity rates at 39.0% compared to 26.4% in Massapequa park.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Columbia at 11.0% compared to 9.0% in Massapequa park.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Massapequa park Columbia
No Schooling 0.3% (45) 0.4% (555)
High School Diploma 15.3% (2,586) 8.4% (11,712)
Less than High School 3.8% (641) 5.9% (8,257)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 36.6% (6,183) 24.7% (34,575)

Education Levels Comparison: Massapequa park vs Columbia

  • In Columbia, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.3% in Massapequa park.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Massapequa park hold a high school diploma at 15.3% compared to 8.4% in Columbia.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Columbia at 5.9%, compared to 3.8% in Massapequa park.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Massapequa park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.6% compared to 24.7% in Columbia.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.