Demographics details for Massapequa park, NY vs Bethlehem, PA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Massapequa park, NY vs Bethlehem, PA.

Data Massapequa park Bethlehem
Population 16,873 77,617
Median Age 43.7 years 35.9 years
Median Income $161,193 $62,072
Married Families 52.0% 29.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating 13%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 3.5

Population Comparison: Massapequa park vs Bethlehem

  • The population in Bethlehem is higher at 77,617, compared to 16,873 in Massapequa park.
  • Residents in Massapequa park have a higher median age of 43.7 years compared to 35.9 years in Bethlehem.
  • Massapequa park has a higher median income of $161,193 compared to $62,072 in Bethlehem.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Massapequa park at 52.0% compared to 29.0% in Bethlehem.
  • The poverty level is higher in Bethlehem at 13%, compared to 0% in Massapequa park.
  • The unemployment rate is the same in both Massapequa park and Bethlehem at 3.5%.

Demographics

Demographics Massapequa park vs Bethlehem provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Massapequa park Bethlehem
Black 1 9
White 88 47
Asian 2 3
Hispanic 5 30
Two or More Races 4 11
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Massapequa park vs Bethlehem

  • In Bethlehem, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 9% compared to 1% in Massapequa park.
  • Massapequa park has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 47% in Bethlehem.
  • In Bethlehem, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 2% in Massapequa park.
  • Bethlehem has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 30%, compared to 5% in Massapequa park.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Bethlehem at 11%, compared to 4% in Massapequa park.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Massapequa park and Bethlehem at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Massapequa park Bethlehem
Mental Health Not Good 13.7% 16.9%
Physical Health Not Good 8.0% 12.1%
Depression 17.9% 21.8%
Smoking 11.5% 18.4%
Binge Drinking 19.2% 17.6%
Obesity 26.4% 34.7%
Disability Percentage 9.0% 13.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Massapequa park vs Bethlehem

  • In Bethlehem, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 13.7% in Massapequa park.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Bethlehem at 21.8% versus 17.9% in Massapequa park.
  • Bethlehem has a higher smoking rate at 18.4% compared to 11.5% in Massapequa park.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Massapequa park at 19.2% compared to 17.6% in Bethlehem.
  • Bethlehem has higher obesity rates at 34.7% compared to 26.4% in Massapequa park.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Bethlehem at 13.0% compared to 9.0% in Massapequa park.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Massapequa park Bethlehem
No Schooling 0.3% (45) 0.6% (452)
High School Diploma 15.3% (2,586) 16.9% (13,125)
Less than High School 3.8% (641) 12.9% (10,045)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 36.6% (6,183) 22.0% (17,044)

Education Levels Comparison: Massapequa park vs Bethlehem

  • In Bethlehem, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.3% in Massapequa park.
  • In Bethlehem, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.9% compared to 15.3% in Massapequa park.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Bethlehem at 12.9%, compared to 3.8% in Massapequa park.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Massapequa park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.6% compared to 22.0% in Bethlehem.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.