Demographics details for Massapequa park, NY vs Beckley, WV

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Massapequa park, NY vs Beckley, WV.

Data Massapequa park Beckley
Population 16,873 16,749
Median Age 43.7 years 40.7 years
Median Income $161,193 $41,277
Married Families 52.0% 32.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating 18%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 3.5

Population Comparison: Massapequa park vs Beckley

  • In Massapequa park, the population is higher at 16,873, compared to 16,749 in Beckley.
  • Residents in Massapequa park have a higher median age of 43.7 years compared to 40.7 years in Beckley.
  • Massapequa park has a higher median income of $161,193 compared to $41,277 in Beckley.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Massapequa park at 52.0% compared to 32.0% in Beckley.
  • The poverty level is higher in Beckley at 18%, compared to 0% in Massapequa park.
  • The unemployment rate is the same in both Massapequa park and Beckley at 3.5%.

Demographics

Demographics Massapequa park vs Beckley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Massapequa park Beckley
Black 1 18
White 88 71
Asian 2 2
Hispanic 5 2
Two or More Races 4 7
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Massapequa park vs Beckley

  • In Beckley, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 18% compared to 1% in Massapequa park.
  • Massapequa park has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 71% in Beckley.
  • Both Massapequa park and Beckley have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Massapequa park at 5% compared to 2% in Beckley.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Beckley at 7%, compared to 4% in Massapequa park.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Massapequa park and Beckley at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Massapequa park Beckley
Mental Health Not Good 13.7% 21.5%
Physical Health Not Good 8.0% 15.9%
Depression 17.9% 27.5%
Smoking 11.5% 24.2%
Binge Drinking 19.2% 11.9%
Obesity 26.4% 41.4%
Disability Percentage 9.0% 26.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Massapequa park vs Beckley

  • In Beckley, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.5% compared to 13.7% in Massapequa park.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Beckley at 27.5% versus 17.9% in Massapequa park.
  • Beckley has a higher smoking rate at 24.2% compared to 11.5% in Massapequa park.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Massapequa park at 19.2% compared to 11.9% in Beckley.
  • Beckley has higher obesity rates at 41.4% compared to 26.4% in Massapequa park.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Beckley at 26.0% compared to 9.0% in Massapequa park.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Massapequa park Beckley
No Schooling 0.3% (45) 1.0% (166)
High School Diploma 15.3% (2,586) 19.1% (3,193)
Less than High School 3.8% (641) 13.5% (2,268)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 36.6% (6,183) 16.4% (2,745)

Education Levels Comparison: Massapequa park vs Beckley

  • In Beckley, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.3% in Massapequa park.
  • In Beckley, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.1% compared to 15.3% in Massapequa park.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Beckley at 13.5%, compared to 3.8% in Massapequa park.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Massapequa park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.6% compared to 16.4% in Beckley.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.