Demographics details for Marysville, KS vs Sugar land, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Marysville, KS vs Sugar land, TX.
| Data | Marysville | Sugar land |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,423 | 109,414 |
| Median Age | 38.8 years | 42.5 years |
| Median Income | $53,424 | $132,247 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 52.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Marysville vs Sugar land
- The population in Sugar land is higher at 109,414, compared to 3,423 in Marysville.
- The median age in Sugar land is higher at 42.5 years, compared to 38.8 years in Marysville.
- Sugar land has a higher median income of $132,247, compared to $53,424 in Marysville.
- In Sugar land, the percentage of married families is higher at 52.0%, compared to 38.0% in Marysville.
- The poverty level is higher in Sugar land at 6%, compared to 0% in Marysville.
- Sugar land has a higher unemployment rate at 4.0% compared to 3.5% in Marysville.
Demographics
Demographics Marysville vs Sugar land provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Marysville | Sugar land |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 7 |
| White | 86 | 33 |
| Asian | 1 | 39 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 13 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Marysville vs Sugar land
- In Sugar land, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 7% compared to 2% in Marysville.
- Marysville has a higher percentage of White residents at 86% compared to 33% in Sugar land.
- In Sugar land, the Asian population stands at 39%, greater than 1% in Marysville.
- Sugar land has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 13%, compared to 5% in Marysville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Sugar land at 8%, compared to 6% in Marysville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Marysville and Sugar land at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Marysville | Sugar land |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.7% | 12.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.0% | 7.4% |
| Depression | 20.6% | 16.9% |
| Smoking | 19.9% | 9.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.1% | 16.0% |
| Obesity | 40.6% | 25.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Marysville vs Sugar land
- More residents in Marysville report poor mental health at 16.7% compared to 12.5% in Sugar land.
- Depression is more prevalent in Marysville at 20.6% compared to 16.9% in Sugar land.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Marysville at 19.9% compared to 9.6% in Sugar land.
- Binge drinking is more common in Marysville at 20.1% compared to 16.0% in Sugar land.
- Obesity rates are higher in Marysville at 40.6% compared to 25.0% in Sugar land.
- Disability percentages are higher in Marysville at 16.0% compared to 7.0% in Sugar land.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Marysville | Sugar land |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (8) | 1.2% (1,314) |
| High School Diploma | 20.5% (701) | 7.3% (7,972) |
| Less than High School | 12.0% (410) | 4.3% (4,753) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.7% (674) | 42.8% (46,851) |
Education Levels Comparison: Marysville vs Sugar land
- In Sugar land, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.2% in Marysville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Marysville hold a high school diploma at 20.5% compared to 7.3% in Sugar land.
- More residents in Marysville have less than a high school education at 12.0% compared to 4.3% in Sugar land.
- In Sugar land, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 42.8% compared to 19.7% in Marysville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.