Demographics details for Martinsville, IN vs Cochran, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Martinsville, IN vs Cochran, GA.
Data | Martinsville | Cochran |
---|---|---|
Population | 11,858 | 4,647 |
Median Age | 36.2 years | 28.9 years |
Median Income | $57,383 | $31,326 |
Married Families | 36.0% | 25.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 19% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Martinsville vs Cochran
- In Martinsville, the population is higher at 11,858, compared to 4,647 in Cochran.
- Residents in Martinsville have a higher median age of 36.2 years compared to 28.9 years in Cochran.
- Martinsville has a higher median income of $57,383 compared to $31,326 in Cochran.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Martinsville at 36.0% compared to 25.0% in Cochran.
- The poverty level is higher in Cochran at 19%, compared to 12% in Martinsville.
- The unemployment rate in Martinsville is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.2% in Cochran.
Demographics
Demographics Martinsville vs Cochran provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Martinsville | Cochran |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 53 |
White | 94 | 40 |
Asian | 1 | 2 |
Hispanic | 2 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 2 | 3 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Martinsville vs Cochran
- In Cochran, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 53% compared to 1% in Martinsville.
- Martinsville has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 40% in Cochran.
- In Cochran, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Martinsville.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Martinsville and Cochran at 2%.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Cochran at 3%, compared to 2% in Martinsville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Martinsville and Cochran at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Martinsville | Cochran |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.9% | 18.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 13.7% |
Depression | 27.9% | 21.8% |
Smoking | 23.4% | 20.0% |
Binge Drinking | 18.0% | 13.6% |
Obesity | 39.7% | 38.5% |
Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Martinsville vs Cochran
- More residents in Martinsville report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 18.3% in Cochran.
- Depression is more prevalent in Martinsville at 27.9% compared to 21.8% in Cochran.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Martinsville at 23.4% compared to 20.0% in Cochran.
- Binge drinking is more common in Martinsville at 18.0% compared to 13.6% in Cochran.
- Obesity rates are higher in Martinsville at 39.7% compared to 38.5% in Cochran.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cochran at 16.0% compared to 15.0% in Martinsville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Martinsville | Cochran |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.9% (101) | 1.2% (54) |
High School Diploma | 22.5% (2,671) | 12.2% (569) |
Less than High School | 19.7% (2,340) | 15.1% (703) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.4% (1,001) | 12.7% (592) |
Education Levels Comparison: Martinsville vs Cochran
- In Cochran, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.9% in Martinsville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Martinsville hold a high school diploma at 22.5% compared to 12.2% in Cochran.
- More residents in Martinsville have less than a high school education at 19.7% compared to 15.1% in Cochran.
- In Cochran, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.7% compared to 8.4% in Martinsville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.