Demographics details for Martinsdale, MT vs Hobbs, NM
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Martinsdale, MT vs Hobbs, NM.
| Data | Martinsdale | Hobbs |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 37 | 39,648 |
| Median Age | 40.8 years | 30.8 years |
| Median Income | $55,489 | $63,804 |
| Married Families | Data is updating | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.9 |
Population Comparison: Martinsdale vs Hobbs
- The population in Hobbs is higher at 39,648, compared to 37 in Martinsdale.
- Residents in Martinsdale have a higher median age of 40.8 years compared to 30.8 years in Hobbs.
- Hobbs has a higher median income of $63,804, compared to $55,489 in Martinsdale.
- In Hobbs, the percentage of married families is higher at 32.0%, compared to 0.0% in Martinsdale.
- The poverty level is higher in Hobbs at 15%, compared to 0% in Martinsdale.
- Hobbs has a higher unemployment rate at 4.9% compared to 3.2% in Martinsdale.
Demographics
Demographics Martinsdale vs Hobbs provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Martinsdale | Hobbs |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 6 |
| White | 100 | 4 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 63 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 25 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Martinsdale vs Hobbs
- In Hobbs, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 0% in Martinsdale.
- Martinsdale has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to 4% in Hobbs.
- In Hobbs, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Martinsdale.
- Hobbs has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 63%, compared to 0% in Martinsdale.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Hobbs at 25%, compared to 0% in Martinsdale.
- In Hobbs, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Martinsdale.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Martinsdale | Hobbs |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.2% | 17.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.4% | 13.3% |
| Depression | 20.1% | 20.6% |
| Smoking | 16.8% | 17.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.5% | 15.4% |
| Obesity | 35.3% | 41.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 22.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Martinsdale vs Hobbs
- In Hobbs, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 12.2% in Martinsdale.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Hobbs at 20.6% versus 20.1% in Martinsdale.
- Hobbs has a higher smoking rate at 17.7% compared to 16.8% in Martinsdale.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Hobbs at 15.4% compared to 14.5% in Martinsdale.
- Hobbs has higher obesity rates at 41.7% compared to 35.3% in Martinsdale.
- Disability percentages are higher in Martinsdale at 22.0% compared to 11.0% in Hobbs.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Martinsdale | Hobbs |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 2.2% (856) |
| High School Diploma | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 15.9% (6,312) |
| Less than High School | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 26.2% (10,381) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 81.1% (30) | 9.2% (3,667) |
Education Levels Comparison: Martinsdale vs Hobbs
- In Hobbs, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.2% compared to 0.0% in Martinsdale.
- In Hobbs, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.9% compared to 0.0% in Martinsdale.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Hobbs at 26.2%, compared to 0.0% in Martinsdale.
- A higher percentage of residents in Martinsdale hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 81.1% compared to 9.2% in Hobbs.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.