Demographics details for Martinsdale, MT vs Girdletree, MD

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Martinsdale, MT vs Girdletree, MD.

Data Martinsdale Girdletree
Population 37 122
Median Age 40.8 years 57.4 years
Median Income $55,489 $129,167
Married Families Data is updating 50.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 3.2 Data is updating

Population Comparison: Martinsdale vs Girdletree

  • The population in Girdletree is higher at 122, compared to 37 in Martinsdale.
  • The median age in Girdletree is higher at 57.4 years, compared to 40.8 years in Martinsdale.
  • Girdletree has a higher median income of $129,167, compared to $55,489 in Martinsdale.
  • In Girdletree, the percentage of married families is higher at 50.0%, compared to 0.0% in Martinsdale.
  • The poverty level is identical in both Martinsdale and Girdletree at 0%.
  • The unemployment rate in Martinsdale is higher at 3.2%, compared to 0.0% in Girdletree.

Demographics

Demographics Martinsdale vs Girdletree provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Martinsdale Girdletree
Black Data is updating Data is updating
White 100 89
Asian Data is updating 11
Hispanic Data is updating Data is updating
Two or More Races Data is updating Data is updating
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Martinsdale vs Girdletree

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Martinsdale and Girdletree at 0%.
  • Martinsdale has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to 89% in Girdletree.
  • In Girdletree, the Asian population stands at 11%, greater than 0% in Martinsdale.
  • The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Martinsdale and Girdletree at 0%.
  • Both Martinsdale and Girdletree have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 0%.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Martinsdale and Girdletree at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Martinsdale Girdletree
Mental Health Not Good 12.2% 16.7%
Physical Health Not Good 14.4% 10.6%
Depression 20.1% 20.8%
Smoking 16.8% 18.7%
Binge Drinking 14.5% 18.8%
Obesity 35.3% 39.6%
Disability Percentage 22.0% 8.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Martinsdale vs Girdletree

  • In Girdletree, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.7% compared to 12.2% in Martinsdale.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Girdletree at 20.8% versus 20.1% in Martinsdale.
  • Girdletree has a higher smoking rate at 18.7% compared to 16.8% in Martinsdale.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Girdletree at 18.8% compared to 14.5% in Martinsdale.
  • Girdletree has higher obesity rates at 39.6% compared to 35.3% in Martinsdale.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Martinsdale at 22.0% compared to 8.0% in Girdletree.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Martinsdale Girdletree
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 0.0% (Data is updating) 44.3% (54)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 19.7% (24)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 81.1% (30) 5.7% (7)

Education Levels Comparison: Martinsdale vs Girdletree

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Martinsdale and Girdletree at 0.0%.
  • In Girdletree, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 44.3% compared to 0.0% in Martinsdale.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Girdletree at 19.7%, compared to 0.0% in Martinsdale.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Martinsdale hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 81.1% compared to 5.7% in Girdletree.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.