Demographics details for Martinsdale, MT vs Covington, TN

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Martinsdale, MT vs Covington, TN.

Data Martinsdale Covington
Population 37 8,597
Median Age 40.8 years 35.4 years
Median Income $55,489 $44,384
Married Families Data is updating 31.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating 14%
Unemployment Rate 3.2 5.2

Population Comparison: Martinsdale vs Covington

  • The population in Covington is higher at 8,597, compared to 37 in Martinsdale.
  • Residents in Martinsdale have a higher median age of 40.8 years compared to 35.4 years in Covington.
  • Martinsdale has a higher median income of $55,489 compared to $44,384 in Covington.
  • In Covington, the percentage of married families is higher at 31.0%, compared to 0.0% in Martinsdale.
  • The poverty level is higher in Covington at 14%, compared to 0% in Martinsdale.
  • Covington has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 3.2% in Martinsdale.

Demographics

Demographics Martinsdale vs Covington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Martinsdale Covington
Black Data is updating 55
White 100 41
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic Data is updating 2
Two or More Races Data is updating 2
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Martinsdale vs Covington

  • In Covington, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 55% compared to 0% in Martinsdale.
  • Martinsdale has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to 41% in Covington.
  • Both Martinsdale and Covington have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • Covington has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 2%, compared to 0% in Martinsdale.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Covington at 2%, compared to 0% in Martinsdale.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Martinsdale and Covington at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Martinsdale Covington
Mental Health Not Good 12.2% 22.2%
Physical Health Not Good 14.4% 16.3%
Depression 20.1% 28.8%
Smoking 16.8% 26.8%
Binge Drinking 14.5% 12.9%
Obesity 35.3% 48.0%
Disability Percentage 22.0% 18.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Martinsdale vs Covington

  • In Covington, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 22.2% compared to 12.2% in Martinsdale.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Covington at 28.8% versus 20.1% in Martinsdale.
  • Covington has a higher smoking rate at 26.8% compared to 16.8% in Martinsdale.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Martinsdale at 14.5% compared to 12.9% in Covington.
  • Covington has higher obesity rates at 48.0% compared to 35.3% in Martinsdale.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Martinsdale at 22.0% compared to 18.0% in Covington.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Martinsdale Covington
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 1.8% (155)
High School Diploma 0.0% (Data is updating) 21.2% (1,822)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 14.8% (1,273)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 81.1% (30) 8.5% (734)

Education Levels Comparison: Martinsdale vs Covington

  • In Covington, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.0% in Martinsdale.
  • In Covington, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.2% compared to 0.0% in Martinsdale.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Covington at 14.8%, compared to 0.0% in Martinsdale.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Martinsdale hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 81.1% compared to 8.5% in Covington.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.