Demographics details for Marshalltown, IA vs Woodstock, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Marshalltown, IA vs Woodstock, GA.
Data | Marshalltown | Woodstock |
---|---|---|
Population | 27,433 | 37,350 |
Median Age | 35.5 years | 36.4 years |
Median Income | $65,000 | $100,913 |
Married Families | 39.0% | 40.0% |
Poverty Level | 14% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 6.5 | 3.4 |
Population Comparison: Marshalltown vs Woodstock
- The population in Woodstock is higher at 37,350, compared to 27,433 in Marshalltown.
- The median age in Woodstock is higher at 36.4 years, compared to 35.5 years in Marshalltown.
- Woodstock has a higher median income of $100,913, compared to $65,000 in Marshalltown.
- In Woodstock, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 39.0% in Marshalltown.
- Marshalltown has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 5% in Woodstock.
- The unemployment rate in Marshalltown is higher at 6.5%, compared to 3.4% in Woodstock.
Demographics
Demographics Marshalltown vs Woodstock provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Marshalltown | Woodstock |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | 11 |
White | 45 | 69 |
Asian | 5 | 3 |
Hispanic | 34 | 9 |
Two or More Races | 12 | 8 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Marshalltown vs Woodstock
- In Woodstock, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 11% compared to 3% in Marshalltown.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Woodstock at 69% compared to 45% in Marshalltown.
- The Asian population is larger in Marshalltown at 5% compared to 3% in Woodstock.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Marshalltown at 34% compared to 9% in Woodstock.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Marshalltown at 12% compared to 8% in Woodstock.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Marshalltown at 1% compared to 0% in Woodstock.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Marshalltown | Woodstock |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.6% | 14.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.6% | 9.4% |
Depression | 23.0% | 20.8% |
Smoking | 20.7% | 12.1% |
Binge Drinking | 19.4% | 16.5% |
Obesity | 38.6% | 30.2% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Marshalltown vs Woodstock
- More residents in Marshalltown report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 14.1% in Woodstock.
- Depression is more prevalent in Marshalltown at 23.0% compared to 20.8% in Woodstock.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Marshalltown at 20.7% compared to 12.1% in Woodstock.
- Binge drinking is more common in Marshalltown at 19.4% compared to 16.5% in Woodstock.
- Obesity rates are higher in Marshalltown at 38.6% compared to 30.2% in Woodstock.
- Disability percentages are higher in Marshalltown at 12.0% compared to 9.0% in Woodstock.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Marshalltown | Woodstock |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.4% (646) | 0.3% (107) |
High School Diploma | 17.3% (4,740) | 8.2% (3,052) |
Less than High School | 23.6% (6,481) | 3.7% (1,375) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.2% (3,347) | 32.9% (12,290) |
Education Levels Comparison: Marshalltown vs Woodstock
- A higher percentage of residents in Marshalltown have no formal schooling at 2.4% compared to 0.3% in Woodstock.
- A higher percentage of residents in Marshalltown hold a high school diploma at 17.3% compared to 8.2% in Woodstock.
- More residents in Marshalltown have less than a high school education at 23.6% compared to 3.7% in Woodstock.
- In Woodstock, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 32.9% compared to 12.2% in Marshalltown.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.