Demographics details for Marshall, TX vs South portland, ME
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Marshall, TX vs South portland, ME.
Data | Marshall | South portland |
---|---|---|
Population | 23,641 | 27,026 |
Median Age | 34.1 years | 41.0 years |
Median Income | $49,162 | $82,489 |
Married Families | 27.0% | 38.0% |
Poverty Level | 17% | 7% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 2.4 |
Population Comparison: Marshall vs South portland
- The population in South portland is higher at 27,026, compared to 23,641 in Marshall.
- The median age in South portland is higher at 41.0 years, compared to 34.1 years in Marshall.
- South portland has a higher median income of $82,489, compared to $49,162 in Marshall.
- In South portland, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 27.0% in Marshall.
- Marshall has a higher poverty level at 17% compared to 7% in South portland.
- The unemployment rate in Marshall is higher at 5.1%, compared to 2.4% in South portland.
Demographics
Demographics Marshall vs South portland provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Marshall | South portland |
---|---|---|
Black | 40 | 7 |
White | 28 | 83 |
Asian | 1 | 2 |
Hispanic | 20 | 3 |
Two or More Races | 11 | 5 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Marshall vs South portland
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Marshall at 40% compared to 7% in South portland.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in South portland at 83% compared to 28% in Marshall.
- In South portland, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Marshall.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Marshall at 20% compared to 3% in South portland.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Marshall at 11% compared to 5% in South portland.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Marshall and South portland at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Marshall | South portland |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.2% | 14.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.8% | 8.5% |
Depression | 22.7% | 23.8% |
Smoking | 21.0% | 12.2% |
Binge Drinking | 16.2% | 20.1% |
Obesity | 42.0% | 26.2% |
Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Marshall vs South portland
- More residents in Marshall report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 14.8% in South portland.
- Higher depression rates are seen in South portland at 23.8% versus 22.7% in Marshall.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Marshall at 21.0% compared to 12.2% in South portland.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in South portland at 20.1% compared to 16.2% in Marshall.
- Obesity rates are higher in Marshall at 42.0% compared to 26.2% in South portland.
- Disability percentages are higher in Marshall at 17.0% compared to 13.0% in South portland.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Marshall | South portland |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.8% (195) | 0.3% (93) |
High School Diploma | 18.7% (4,412) | 13.2% (3,562) |
Less than High School | 10.7% (2,527) | 4.4% (1,202) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.2% (3,127) | 35.5% (9,604) |
Education Levels Comparison: Marshall vs South portland
- A higher percentage of residents in Marshall have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.3% in South portland.
- A higher percentage of residents in Marshall hold a high school diploma at 18.7% compared to 13.2% in South portland.
- More residents in Marshall have less than a high school education at 10.7% compared to 4.4% in South portland.
- In South portland, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.5% compared to 13.2% in Marshall.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.