Demographics details for Marshall, TX vs Shelbyville, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Marshall, TX vs Shelbyville, TN.
Data | Marshall | Shelbyville |
---|---|---|
Population | 23,641 | 24,452 |
Median Age | 34.1 years | 31.3 years |
Median Income | $49,162 | $50,694 |
Married Families | 27.0% | 25.0% |
Poverty Level | 17% | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 3.1 |
Population Comparison: Marshall vs Shelbyville
- The population in Shelbyville is higher at 24,452, compared to 23,641 in Marshall.
- Residents in Marshall have a higher median age of 34.1 years compared to 31.3 years in Shelbyville.
- Shelbyville has a higher median income of $50,694, compared to $49,162 in Marshall.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Marshall at 27.0% compared to 25.0% in Shelbyville.
- Marshall has a higher poverty level at 17% compared to 15% in Shelbyville.
- The unemployment rate in Marshall is higher at 5.1%, compared to 3.1% in Shelbyville.
Demographics
Demographics Marshall vs Shelbyville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Marshall | Shelbyville |
---|---|---|
Black | 40 | 11 |
White | 28 | 51 |
Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 20 | 24 |
Two or More Races | 11 | 12 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Marshall vs Shelbyville
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Marshall at 40% compared to 11% in Shelbyville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Shelbyville at 51% compared to 28% in Marshall.
- The Asian population is larger in Marshall at 1% compared to 0% in Shelbyville.
- Shelbyville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 24%, compared to 20% in Marshall.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Shelbyville at 12%, compared to 11% in Marshall.
- In Shelbyville, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Marshall.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Marshall | Shelbyville |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.2% | 20.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.8% | 15.6% |
Depression | 22.7% | 27.5% |
Smoking | 21.0% | 25.2% |
Binge Drinking | 16.2% | 14.3% |
Obesity | 42.0% | 39.4% |
Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Marshall vs Shelbyville
- In Shelbyville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.3% compared to 19.2% in Marshall.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Shelbyville at 27.5% versus 22.7% in Marshall.
- Shelbyville has a higher smoking rate at 25.2% compared to 21.0% in Marshall.
- Binge drinking is more common in Marshall at 16.2% compared to 14.3% in Shelbyville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Marshall at 42.0% compared to 39.4% in Shelbyville.
- Disability percentages are higher in Marshall at 17.0% compared to 13.0% in Shelbyville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Marshall | Shelbyville |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.8% (195) | 0.8% (185) |
High School Diploma | 18.7% (4,412) | 21.6% (5,273) |
Less than High School | 10.7% (2,527) | 20.7% (5,051) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.2% (3,127) | 7.7% (1,889) |
Education Levels Comparison: Marshall vs Shelbyville
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Marshall and Shelbyville at 0.8%.
- In Shelbyville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.6% compared to 18.7% in Marshall.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Shelbyville at 20.7%, compared to 10.7% in Marshall.
- A higher percentage of residents in Marshall hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.2% compared to 7.7% in Shelbyville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.