Demographics details for Marshall, TX vs Locust grove, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Marshall, TX vs Locust grove, GA.
Data | Marshall | Locust grove |
---|---|---|
Population | 23,641 | 10,734 |
Median Age | 34.1 years | 33.1 years |
Median Income | $49,162 | $67,143 |
Married Families | 27.0% | 26.0% |
Poverty Level | 17% | 6% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Marshall vs Locust grove
- In Marshall, the population is higher at 23,641, compared to 10,734 in Locust grove.
- Residents in Marshall have a higher median age of 34.1 years compared to 33.1 years in Locust grove.
- Locust grove has a higher median income of $67,143, compared to $49,162 in Marshall.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Marshall at 27.0% compared to 26.0% in Locust grove.
- Marshall has a higher poverty level at 17% compared to 6% in Locust grove.
- The unemployment rate in Marshall is higher at 5.1%, compared to 4.5% in Locust grove.
Demographics
Demographics Marshall vs Locust grove provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Marshall | Locust grove |
---|---|---|
Black | 40 | 37 |
White | 28 | 50 |
Asian | 1 | 1 |
Hispanic | 20 | 8 |
Two or More Races | 11 | 4 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Marshall vs Locust grove
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Marshall at 40% compared to 37% in Locust grove.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Locust grove at 50% compared to 28% in Marshall.
- Both Marshall and Locust grove have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Marshall at 20% compared to 8% in Locust grove.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Marshall at 11% compared to 4% in Locust grove.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Marshall and Locust grove at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Marshall | Locust grove |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.2% | 16.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.8% | 11.5% |
Depression | 22.7% | 21.0% |
Smoking | 21.0% | 16.6% |
Binge Drinking | 16.2% | 16.4% |
Obesity | 42.0% | 37.3% |
Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Marshall vs Locust grove
- More residents in Marshall report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 16.6% in Locust grove.
- Depression is more prevalent in Marshall at 22.7% compared to 21.0% in Locust grove.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Marshall at 21.0% compared to 16.6% in Locust grove.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Locust grove at 16.4% compared to 16.2% in Marshall.
- Obesity rates are higher in Marshall at 42.0% compared to 37.3% in Locust grove.
- Disability percentages are higher in Marshall at 17.0% compared to 10.0% in Locust grove.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Marshall | Locust grove |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.8% (195) | 0.3% (30) |
High School Diploma | 18.7% (4,412) | 17.0% (1,824) |
Less than High School | 10.7% (2,527) | 6.2% (663) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.2% (3,127) | 12.7% (1,367) |
Education Levels Comparison: Marshall vs Locust grove
- A higher percentage of residents in Marshall have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.3% in Locust grove.
- A higher percentage of residents in Marshall hold a high school diploma at 18.7% compared to 17.0% in Locust grove.
- More residents in Marshall have less than a high school education at 10.7% compared to 6.2% in Locust grove.
- A higher percentage of residents in Marshall hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.2% compared to 12.7% in Locust grove.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.