Demographics details for Marshall, TX vs Kings mountain, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Marshall, TX vs Kings mountain, NC.
Data | Marshall | Kings mountain |
---|---|---|
Population | 23,641 | 11,638 |
Median Age | 34.1 years | 41.5 years |
Median Income | $49,162 | $45,301 |
Married Families | 27.0% | 24.0% |
Poverty Level | 17% | 11% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Marshall vs Kings mountain
- In Marshall, the population is higher at 23,641, compared to 11,638 in Kings mountain.
- The median age in Kings mountain is higher at 41.5 years, compared to 34.1 years in Marshall.
- Marshall has a higher median income of $49,162 compared to $45,301 in Kings mountain.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Marshall at 27.0% compared to 24.0% in Kings mountain.
- Marshall has a higher poverty level at 17% compared to 11% in Kings mountain.
- The unemployment rate in Marshall is higher at 5.1%, compared to 4.2% in Kings mountain.
Demographics
Demographics Marshall vs Kings mountain provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Marshall | Kings mountain |
---|---|---|
Black | 40 | 25 |
White | 28 | 68 |
Asian | 1 | 2 |
Hispanic | 20 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 11 | 3 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Marshall vs Kings mountain
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Marshall at 40% compared to 25% in Kings mountain.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Kings mountain at 68% compared to 28% in Marshall.
- In Kings mountain, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Marshall.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Marshall at 20% compared to 2% in Kings mountain.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Marshall at 11% compared to 3% in Kings mountain.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Marshall and Kings mountain at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Marshall | Kings mountain |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.2% | 18.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.8% | 13.1% |
Depression | 22.7% | 25.7% |
Smoking | 21.0% | 20.9% |
Binge Drinking | 16.2% | 16.3% |
Obesity | 42.0% | 38.0% |
Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Marshall vs Kings mountain
- More residents in Marshall report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 18.3% in Kings mountain.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Kings mountain at 25.7% versus 22.7% in Marshall.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Marshall at 21.0% compared to 20.9% in Kings mountain.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Kings mountain at 16.3% compared to 16.2% in Marshall.
- Obesity rates are higher in Marshall at 42.0% compared to 38.0% in Kings mountain.
- Disability percentages are higher in Marshall at 17.0% compared to 14.0% in Kings mountain.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Marshall | Kings mountain |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.8% (195) | 0.4% (43) |
High School Diploma | 18.7% (4,412) | 21.7% (2,528) |
Less than High School | 10.7% (2,527) | 17.8% (2,071) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.2% (3,127) | 11.6% (1,353) |
Education Levels Comparison: Marshall vs Kings mountain
- A higher percentage of residents in Marshall have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.4% in Kings mountain.
- In Kings mountain, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.7% compared to 18.7% in Marshall.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Kings mountain at 17.8%, compared to 10.7% in Marshall.
- A higher percentage of residents in Marshall hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.2% compared to 11.6% in Kings mountain.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.