Demographics details for Marshall, TX vs Hawthorne, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Marshall, TX vs Hawthorne, CA.
| Data | Marshall | Hawthorne |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 23,641 | 84,563 |
| Median Age | 34.1 years | 33.3 years |
| Median Income | $49,162 | $72,298 |
| Married Families | 27.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 17% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 5.7 |
Population Comparison: Marshall vs Hawthorne
- The population in Hawthorne is higher at 84,563, compared to 23,641 in Marshall.
- Residents in Marshall have a higher median age of 34.1 years compared to 33.3 years in Hawthorne.
- Hawthorne has a higher median income of $72,298, compared to $49,162 in Marshall.
- In Hawthorne, the percentage of married families is higher at 31.0%, compared to 27.0% in Marshall.
- Marshall has a higher poverty level at 17% compared to 14% in Hawthorne.
- Hawthorne has a higher unemployment rate at 5.7% compared to 5.1% in Marshall.
Demographics
Demographics Marshall vs Hawthorne provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Marshall | Hawthorne |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 40 | 27 |
| White | 28 | -10 |
| Asian | 1 | 7 |
| Hispanic | 20 | 57 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 17 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Marshall vs Hawthorne
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Marshall at 40% compared to 27% in Hawthorne.
- Marshall has a higher percentage of White residents at 28% compared to -10% in Hawthorne.
- In Hawthorne, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 1% in Marshall.
- Hawthorne has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 57%, compared to 20% in Marshall.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Hawthorne at 17%, compared to 11% in Marshall.
- In Hawthorne, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Marshall.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Marshall | Hawthorne |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.2% | 16.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.8% | 12.7% |
| Depression | 22.7% | 15.5% |
| Smoking | 21.0% | 12.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.2% | 14.1% |
| Obesity | 42.0% | 32.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Marshall vs Hawthorne
- More residents in Marshall report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 16.5% in Hawthorne.
- Depression is more prevalent in Marshall at 22.7% compared to 15.5% in Hawthorne.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Marshall at 21.0% compared to 12.7% in Hawthorne.
- Binge drinking is more common in Marshall at 16.2% compared to 14.1% in Hawthorne.
- Obesity rates are higher in Marshall at 42.0% compared to 32.9% in Hawthorne.
- Disability percentages are higher in Marshall at 17.0% compared to 9.0% in Hawthorne.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Marshall | Hawthorne |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (195) | 2.6% (2,159) |
| High School Diploma | 18.7% (4,412) | 14.5% (12,220) |
| Less than High School | 10.7% (2,527) | 26.9% (22,712) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.2% (3,127) | 16.4% (13,868) |
Education Levels Comparison: Marshall vs Hawthorne
- In Hawthorne, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.6% compared to 0.8% in Marshall.
- A higher percentage of residents in Marshall hold a high school diploma at 18.7% compared to 14.5% in Hawthorne.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Hawthorne at 26.9%, compared to 10.7% in Marshall.
- In Hawthorne, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.4% compared to 13.2% in Marshall.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.