Demographics details for Marshall, TX vs Camden, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Marshall, TX vs Camden, AR.
| Data | Marshall | Camden |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 23,641 | 10,298 |
| Median Age | 34.1 years | 38.7 years |
| Median Income | $49,162 | $48,302 |
| Married Families | 27.0% | 29.0% |
| Poverty Level | 17% | 19% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Marshall vs Camden
- In Marshall, the population is higher at 23,641, compared to 10,298 in Camden.
- The median age in Camden is higher at 38.7 years, compared to 34.1 years in Marshall.
- Marshall has a higher median income of $49,162 compared to $48,302 in Camden.
- In Camden, the percentage of married families is higher at 29.0%, compared to 27.0% in Marshall.
- The poverty level is higher in Camden at 19%, compared to 17% in Marshall.
- The unemployment rate in Marshall is higher at 5.1%, compared to 3.5% in Camden.
Demographics
Demographics Marshall vs Camden provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Marshall | Camden |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 40 | 52 |
| White | 28 | 44 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 20 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Marshall vs Camden
- In Camden, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 52% compared to 40% in Marshall.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Camden at 44% compared to 28% in Marshall.
- The Asian population is larger in Marshall at 1% compared to 0% in Camden.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Marshall at 20% compared to 2% in Camden.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Marshall at 11% compared to 2% in Camden.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Marshall and Camden at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Marshall | Camden |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.2% | 21.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.8% | 17.0% |
| Depression | 22.7% | 24.4% |
| Smoking | 21.0% | 27.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.2% | 11.9% |
| Obesity | 42.0% | 43.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 27.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Marshall vs Camden
- In Camden, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.7% compared to 19.2% in Marshall.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Camden at 24.4% versus 22.7% in Marshall.
- Camden has a higher smoking rate at 27.3% compared to 21.0% in Marshall.
- Binge drinking is more common in Marshall at 16.2% compared to 11.9% in Camden.
- Camden has higher obesity rates at 43.6% compared to 42.0% in Marshall.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Camden at 27.0% compared to 17.0% in Marshall.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Marshall | Camden |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (195) | 0.3% (28) |
| High School Diploma | 18.7% (4,412) | 20.5% (2,109) |
| Less than High School | 10.7% (2,527) | 14.1% (1,455) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.2% (3,127) | 11.2% (1,152) |
Education Levels Comparison: Marshall vs Camden
- A higher percentage of residents in Marshall have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.3% in Camden.
- In Camden, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.5% compared to 18.7% in Marshall.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Camden at 14.1%, compared to 10.7% in Marshall.
- A higher percentage of residents in Marshall hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.2% compared to 11.2% in Camden.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.