Demographics details for Marshall, MI vs Shirley, NY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Marshall, MI vs Shirley, NY.
| Data | Marshall | Shirley |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 6,753 | 26,498 |
| Median Age | 45.4 years | 40.4 years |
| Median Income | $72,813 | $109,821 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Marshall vs Shirley
- The population in Shirley is higher at 26,498, compared to 6,753 in Marshall.
- Residents in Marshall have a higher median age of 45.4 years compared to 40.4 years in Shirley.
- Shirley has a higher median income of $109,821, compared to $72,813 in Marshall.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Marshall at 43.0% compared to 37.0% in Shirley.
- Marshall has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 6% in Shirley.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Marshall and Shirley at 4.2%.
Demographics
Demographics Marshall vs Shirley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Marshall | Shirley |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 8 |
| White | 94 | 56 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 5 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 23 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Marshall vs Shirley
- In Shirley, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 8% compared to 0% in Marshall.
- Marshall has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 56% in Shirley.
- In Shirley, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 0% in Marshall.
- Shirley has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 23%, compared to 4% in Marshall.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Shirley at 8%, compared to 2% in Marshall.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Marshall and Shirley at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Marshall | Shirley |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.0% | 16.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.6% | 10.7% |
| Depression | 25.2% | 21.1% |
| Smoking | 17.3% | 17.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.0% | 16.0% |
| Obesity | 37.5% | 32.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Marshall vs Shirley
- More residents in Marshall report poor mental health at 17.0% compared to 16.3% in Shirley.
- Depression is more prevalent in Marshall at 25.2% compared to 21.1% in Shirley.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Marshall at 17.3% compared to 17.0% in Shirley.
- Binge drinking is more common in Marshall at 18.0% compared to 16.0% in Shirley.
- Obesity rates are higher in Marshall at 37.5% compared to 32.0% in Shirley.
- Disability percentages are higher in Marshall at 11.0% compared to 10.0% in Shirley.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Marshall | Shirley |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (46) | 2.1% (555) |
| High School Diploma | 15.8% (1,067) | 22.2% (5,874) |
| Less than High School | 7.3% (493) | 13.4% (3,542) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 33.1% (2,233) | 13.4% (3,547) |
Education Levels Comparison: Marshall vs Shirley
- In Shirley, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.7% in Marshall.
- In Shirley, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.2% compared to 15.8% in Marshall.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Shirley at 13.4%, compared to 7.3% in Marshall.
- A higher percentage of residents in Marshall hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 33.1% compared to 13.4% in Shirley.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.