Demographics details for Marshall, MI vs Riverdale, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Marshall, MI vs Riverdale, GA.
| Data | Marshall | Riverdale |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 6,753 | 14,715 |
| Median Age | 45.4 years | 37.4 years |
| Median Income | $72,813 | $61,622 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 28.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 20% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Marshall vs Riverdale
- The population in Riverdale is higher at 14,715, compared to 6,753 in Marshall.
- Residents in Marshall have a higher median age of 45.4 years compared to 37.4 years in Riverdale.
- Marshall has a higher median income of $72,813 compared to $61,622 in Riverdale.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Marshall at 43.0% compared to 28.0% in Riverdale.
- The poverty level is higher in Riverdale at 20%, compared to 9% in Marshall.
- The unemployment rate in Marshall is higher at 4.2%, compared to 4.0% in Riverdale.
Demographics
Demographics Marshall vs Riverdale provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Marshall | Riverdale |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 86 |
| White | 94 | 1 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 7 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Marshall vs Riverdale
- In Riverdale, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 86% compared to 0% in Marshall.
- Marshall has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 1% in Riverdale.
- In Riverdale, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 0% in Marshall.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Marshall at 4% compared to 3% in Riverdale.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Riverdale at 3%, compared to 2% in Marshall.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Marshall and Riverdale at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Marshall | Riverdale |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.0% | 17.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.6% | 13.4% |
| Depression | 25.2% | 15.9% |
| Smoking | 17.3% | 19.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.0% | 12.5% |
| Obesity | 37.5% | 44.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Marshall vs Riverdale
- In Riverdale, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.2% compared to 17.0% in Marshall.
- Depression is more prevalent in Marshall at 25.2% compared to 15.9% in Riverdale.
- Riverdale has a higher smoking rate at 19.2% compared to 17.3% in Marshall.
- Binge drinking is more common in Marshall at 18.0% compared to 12.5% in Riverdale.
- Riverdale has higher obesity rates at 44.0% compared to 37.5% in Marshall.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Riverdale at 12.0% compared to 11.0% in Marshall.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Marshall | Riverdale |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (46) | 3.1% (457) |
| High School Diploma | 15.8% (1,067) | 18.3% (2,693) |
| Less than High School | 7.3% (493) | 9.7% (1,434) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 33.1% (2,233) | 12.3% (1,805) |
Education Levels Comparison: Marshall vs Riverdale
- In Riverdale, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.1% compared to 0.7% in Marshall.
- In Riverdale, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.3% compared to 15.8% in Marshall.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Riverdale at 9.7%, compared to 7.3% in Marshall.
- A higher percentage of residents in Marshall hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 33.1% compared to 12.3% in Riverdale.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.