Demographics details for Marshall, MI vs Richmond, VA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Marshall, MI vs Richmond, VA.
| Data | Marshall | Richmond |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 6,753 | 229,395 |
| Median Age | 45.4 years | 34.5 years |
| Median Income | $72,813 | $59,606 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 25.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Marshall vs Richmond
- The population in Richmond is higher at 229,395, compared to 6,753 in Marshall.
- Residents in Marshall have a higher median age of 45.4 years compared to 34.5 years in Richmond.
- Marshall has a higher median income of $72,813 compared to $59,606 in Richmond.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Marshall at 43.0% compared to 25.0% in Richmond.
- The poverty level is higher in Richmond at 14%, compared to 9% in Marshall.
- The unemployment rate in Marshall is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.5% in Richmond.
Demographics
Demographics Marshall vs Richmond provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Marshall | Richmond |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 44 |
| White | 94 | 40 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Marshall vs Richmond
- In Richmond, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 44% compared to 0% in Marshall.
- Marshall has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 40% in Richmond.
- In Richmond, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Marshall.
- Richmond has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 4% in Marshall.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Richmond at 6%, compared to 2% in Marshall.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Marshall and Richmond at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Marshall | Richmond |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.0% | 18.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.6% | 12.3% |
| Depression | 25.2% | 21.4% |
| Smoking | 17.3% | 18.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.0% | 18.6% |
| Obesity | 37.5% | 34.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Marshall vs Richmond
- In Richmond, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.8% compared to 17.0% in Marshall.
- Depression is more prevalent in Marshall at 25.2% compared to 21.4% in Richmond.
- Richmond has a higher smoking rate at 18.3% compared to 17.3% in Marshall.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Richmond at 18.6% compared to 18.0% in Marshall.
- Obesity rates are higher in Marshall at 37.5% compared to 34.4% in Richmond.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Richmond at 14.0% compared to 11.0% in Marshall.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Marshall | Richmond |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (46) | 0.8% (1,793) |
| High School Diploma | 15.8% (1,067) | 11.6% (26,718) |
| Less than High School | 7.3% (493) | 10.4% (23,891) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 33.1% (2,233) | 31.0% (70,999) |
Education Levels Comparison: Marshall vs Richmond
- In Richmond, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.7% in Marshall.
- A higher percentage of residents in Marshall hold a high school diploma at 15.8% compared to 11.6% in Richmond.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Richmond at 10.4%, compared to 7.3% in Marshall.
- A higher percentage of residents in Marshall hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 33.1% compared to 31.0% in Richmond.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.