Demographics details for Marshall, MI vs Raymore, MO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Marshall, MI vs Raymore, MO.
Data | Marshall | Raymore |
---|---|---|
Population | 6,753 | 24,203 |
Median Age | 45.4 years | 40.0 years |
Median Income | $72,813 | $96,536 |
Married Families | 43.0% | 45.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Marshall vs Raymore
- The population in Raymore is higher at 24,203, compared to 6,753 in Marshall.
- Residents in Marshall have a higher median age of 45.4 years compared to 40.0 years in Raymore.
- Raymore has a higher median income of $96,536, compared to $72,813 in Marshall.
- In Raymore, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 43.0% in Marshall.
- Marshall has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 5% in Raymore.
- The unemployment rate in Marshall is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.2% in Raymore.
Demographics
Demographics Marshall vs Raymore provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Marshall | Raymore |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 10 |
White | 94 | 75 |
Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
Hispanic | 4 | 5 |
Two or More Races | 2 | 9 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Marshall vs Raymore
- In Raymore, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 10% compared to 0% in Marshall.
- Marshall has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 75% in Raymore.
- In Raymore, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Marshall.
- Raymore has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 4% in Marshall.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Raymore at 9%, compared to 2% in Marshall.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Marshall and Raymore at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Marshall | Raymore |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.0% | 15.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.6% | 9.8% |
Depression | 25.2% | 22.9% |
Smoking | 17.3% | 15.5% |
Binge Drinking | 18.0% | 17.8% |
Obesity | 37.5% | 36.5% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Marshall vs Raymore
- More residents in Marshall report poor mental health at 17.0% compared to 15.8% in Raymore.
- Depression is more prevalent in Marshall at 25.2% compared to 22.9% in Raymore.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Marshall at 17.3% compared to 15.5% in Raymore.
- Binge drinking is more common in Marshall at 18.0% compared to 17.8% in Raymore.
- Obesity rates are higher in Marshall at 37.5% compared to 36.5% in Raymore.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Raymore at 12.0% compared to 11.0% in Marshall.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Marshall | Raymore |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.7% (46) | 0.8% (197) |
High School Diploma | 15.8% (1,067) | 13.8% (3,331) |
Less than High School | 7.3% (493) | 4.5% (1,101) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 33.1% (2,233) | 22.1% (5,341) |
Education Levels Comparison: Marshall vs Raymore
- In Raymore, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.7% in Marshall.
- A higher percentage of residents in Marshall hold a high school diploma at 15.8% compared to 13.8% in Raymore.
- More residents in Marshall have less than a high school education at 7.3% compared to 4.5% in Raymore.
- A higher percentage of residents in Marshall hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 33.1% compared to 22.1% in Raymore.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.