Demographics details for Marshall, MI vs Perry hall, MD
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Marshall, MI vs Perry hall, MD.
Data | Marshall | Perry hall |
---|---|---|
Population | 6,753 | 29,255 |
Median Age | 45.4 years | 38.9 years |
Median Income | $72,813 | $103,061 |
Married Families | 43.0% | 44.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Marshall vs Perry hall
- The population in Perry hall is higher at 29,255, compared to 6,753 in Marshall.
- Residents in Marshall have a higher median age of 45.4 years compared to 38.9 years in Perry hall.
- Perry hall has a higher median income of $103,061, compared to $72,813 in Marshall.
- In Perry hall, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 43.0% in Marshall.
- Marshall has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 5% in Perry hall.
- The unemployment rate in Marshall is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.2% in Perry hall.
Demographics
Demographics Marshall vs Perry hall provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Marshall | Perry hall |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 16 |
White | 94 | 59 |
Asian | Data is updating | 14 |
Hispanic | 4 | 6 |
Two or More Races | 2 | 5 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Marshall vs Perry hall
- In Perry hall, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 16% compared to 0% in Marshall.
- Marshall has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 59% in Perry hall.
- In Perry hall, the Asian population stands at 14%, greater than 0% in Marshall.
- Perry hall has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 4% in Marshall.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Perry hall at 5%, compared to 2% in Marshall.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Marshall and Perry hall at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Marshall | Perry hall |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.0% | 15.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.6% | 8.5% |
Depression | 25.2% | 22.7% |
Smoking | 17.3% | 12.1% |
Binge Drinking | 18.0% | 16.1% |
Obesity | 37.5% | 33.1% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Marshall vs Perry hall
- More residents in Marshall report poor mental health at 17.0% compared to 15.2% in Perry hall.
- Depression is more prevalent in Marshall at 25.2% compared to 22.7% in Perry hall.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Marshall at 17.3% compared to 12.1% in Perry hall.
- Binge drinking is more common in Marshall at 18.0% compared to 16.1% in Perry hall.
- Obesity rates are higher in Marshall at 37.5% compared to 33.1% in Perry hall.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Marshall and Perry hall at 11.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Marshall | Perry hall |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.7% (46) | 1.3% (369) |
High School Diploma | 15.8% (1,067) | 12.2% (3,580) |
Less than High School | 7.3% (493) | 8.8% (2,578) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 33.1% (2,233) | 31.4% (9,197) |
Education Levels Comparison: Marshall vs Perry hall
- In Perry hall, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.7% in Marshall.
- A higher percentage of residents in Marshall hold a high school diploma at 15.8% compared to 12.2% in Perry hall.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Perry hall at 8.8%, compared to 7.3% in Marshall.
- A higher percentage of residents in Marshall hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 33.1% compared to 31.4% in Perry hall.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.