Demographics details for Marshall, MI vs Locust grove, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Marshall, MI vs Locust grove, OK.
Data | Marshall | Locust grove |
---|---|---|
Population | 6,753 | 1,387 |
Median Age | 45.4 years | 36.6 years |
Median Income | $72,813 | $41,313 |
Married Families | 43.0% | 34.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | 14% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Marshall vs Locust grove
- In Marshall, the population is higher at 6,753, compared to 1,387 in Locust grove.
- Residents in Marshall have a higher median age of 45.4 years compared to 36.6 years in Locust grove.
- Marshall has a higher median income of $72,813 compared to $41,313 in Locust grove.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Marshall at 43.0% compared to 34.0% in Locust grove.
- The poverty level is higher in Locust grove at 14%, compared to 9% in Marshall.
- The unemployment rate in Marshall is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.2% in Locust grove.
Demographics
Demographics Marshall vs Locust grove provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Marshall | Locust grove |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 1 |
White | 94 | 30 |
Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
Hispanic | 4 | 4 |
Two or More Races | 2 | 14 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 50 |
Demographics Comparison: Marshall vs Locust grove
- In Locust grove, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Marshall.
- Marshall has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 30% in Locust grove.
- In Locust grove, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Marshall.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Marshall and Locust grove at 4%.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Locust grove at 14%, compared to 2% in Marshall.
- In Locust grove, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 50%, compared to 0% in Marshall.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Marshall | Locust grove |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.0% | 21.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.6% | 16.5% |
Depression | 25.2% | 27.1% |
Smoking | 17.3% | 27.8% |
Binge Drinking | 18.0% | 13.4% |
Obesity | 37.5% | 44.6% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Marshall vs Locust grove
- In Locust grove, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.9% compared to 17.0% in Marshall.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Locust grove at 27.1% versus 25.2% in Marshall.
- Locust grove has a higher smoking rate at 27.8% compared to 17.3% in Marshall.
- Binge drinking is more common in Marshall at 18.0% compared to 13.4% in Locust grove.
- Locust grove has higher obesity rates at 44.6% compared to 37.5% in Marshall.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Locust grove at 24.0% compared to 11.0% in Marshall.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Marshall | Locust grove |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.7% (46) | 0.3% (4) |
High School Diploma | 15.8% (1,067) | 20.5% (285) |
Less than High School | 7.3% (493) | 13.1% (182) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 33.1% (2,233) | 7.1% (98) |
Education Levels Comparison: Marshall vs Locust grove
- A higher percentage of residents in Marshall have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.3% in Locust grove.
- In Locust grove, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.5% compared to 15.8% in Marshall.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Locust grove at 13.1%, compared to 7.3% in Marshall.
- A higher percentage of residents in Marshall hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 33.1% compared to 7.1% in Locust grove.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.