Demographics details for Marshall, MI vs Gallup, NM
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Marshall, MI vs Gallup, NM.
| Data | Marshall | Gallup |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 6,753 | 20,932 |
| Median Age | 45.4 years | 34.1 years |
| Median Income | $72,813 | $58,358 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 28.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 21% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 6.1 |
Population Comparison: Marshall vs Gallup
- The population in Gallup is higher at 20,932, compared to 6,753 in Marshall.
- Residents in Marshall have a higher median age of 45.4 years compared to 34.1 years in Gallup.
- Marshall has a higher median income of $72,813 compared to $58,358 in Gallup.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Marshall at 43.0% compared to 28.0% in Gallup.
- The poverty level is higher in Gallup at 21%, compared to 9% in Marshall.
- Gallup has a higher unemployment rate at 6.1% compared to 4.2% in Marshall.
Demographics
Demographics Marshall vs Gallup provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Marshall | Gallup |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 2 |
| White | 94 | 1 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 4 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 33 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 51 |
Demographics Comparison: Marshall vs Gallup
- In Gallup, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in Marshall.
- Marshall has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 1% in Gallup.
- In Gallup, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 0% in Marshall.
- Gallup has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 33%, compared to 4% in Marshall.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Gallup at 9%, compared to 2% in Marshall.
- In Gallup, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 51%, compared to 0% in Marshall.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Marshall | Gallup |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.0% | 18.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.6% | 13.4% |
| Depression | 25.2% | 18.5% |
| Smoking | 17.3% | 18.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.0% | 12.9% |
| Obesity | 37.5% | 39.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Marshall vs Gallup
- In Gallup, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.1% compared to 17.0% in Marshall.
- Depression is more prevalent in Marshall at 25.2% compared to 18.5% in Gallup.
- Gallup has a higher smoking rate at 18.6% compared to 17.3% in Marshall.
- Binge drinking is more common in Marshall at 18.0% compared to 12.9% in Gallup.
- Gallup has higher obesity rates at 39.4% compared to 37.5% in Marshall.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Gallup at 15.0% compared to 11.0% in Marshall.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Marshall | Gallup |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (46) | 0.7% (152) |
| High School Diploma | 15.8% (1,067) | 17.7% (3,703) |
| Less than High School | 7.3% (493) | 11.9% (2,501) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 33.1% (2,233) | 14.9% (3,119) |
Education Levels Comparison: Marshall vs Gallup
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Marshall and Gallup at 0.7%.
- In Gallup, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.7% compared to 15.8% in Marshall.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Gallup at 11.9%, compared to 7.3% in Marshall.
- A higher percentage of residents in Marshall hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 33.1% compared to 14.9% in Gallup.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.