Demographics details for Marshall, MI vs Fairfield, IA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Marshall, MI vs Fairfield, IA.
| Data | Marshall | Fairfield |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 6,753 | 9,464 |
| Median Age | 45.4 years | 43.0 years |
| Median Income | $72,813 | $44,277 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Marshall vs Fairfield
- The population in Fairfield is higher at 9,464, compared to 6,753 in Marshall.
- Residents in Marshall have a higher median age of 45.4 years compared to 43.0 years in Fairfield.
- Marshall has a higher median income of $72,813 compared to $44,277 in Fairfield.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Marshall at 43.0% compared to 32.0% in Fairfield.
- The poverty level is higher in Fairfield at 12%, compared to 9% in Marshall.
- The unemployment rate in Marshall is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.5% in Fairfield.
Demographics
Demographics Marshall vs Fairfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Marshall | Fairfield |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 8 |
| White | 94 | 73 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 9 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Marshall vs Fairfield
- In Fairfield, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 8% compared to 0% in Marshall.
- Marshall has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 73% in Fairfield.
- In Fairfield, the Asian population stands at 9%, greater than 0% in Marshall.
- Fairfield has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 4% in Marshall.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fairfield at 4%, compared to 2% in Marshall.
- In Fairfield, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Marshall.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Marshall | Fairfield |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.0% | 15.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.6% | 10.1% |
| Depression | 25.2% | 20.1% |
| Smoking | 17.3% | 17.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.0% | 19.8% |
| Obesity | 37.5% | 36.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Marshall vs Fairfield
- More residents in Marshall report poor mental health at 17.0% compared to 15.5% in Fairfield.
- Depression is more prevalent in Marshall at 25.2% compared to 20.1% in Fairfield.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Marshall at 17.3% compared to 17.1% in Fairfield.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fairfield at 19.8% compared to 18.0% in Marshall.
- Obesity rates are higher in Marshall at 37.5% compared to 36.6% in Fairfield.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fairfield at 13.0% compared to 11.0% in Marshall.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Marshall | Fairfield |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (46) | 0.1% (6) |
| High School Diploma | 15.8% (1,067) | 12.1% (1,145) |
| Less than High School | 7.3% (493) | 6.3% (594) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 33.1% (2,233) | 38.1% (3,604) |
Education Levels Comparison: Marshall vs Fairfield
- A higher percentage of residents in Marshall have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.1% in Fairfield.
- A higher percentage of residents in Marshall hold a high school diploma at 15.8% compared to 12.1% in Fairfield.
- More residents in Marshall have less than a high school education at 7.3% compared to 6.3% in Fairfield.
- In Fairfield, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.1% compared to 33.1% in Marshall.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.